On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Cristian Gafton wrote:
that. I have seen this called by some folks an "all or
nothing"
policy - and the debate on its merits can go on ad nauseum. From
where we stand, there is a big difference in costs and effort
required to support a company with 5 servers compared to one with
1000. We think it is fair to use that number of servers as an
indicator of how complex things will be for our support staff.
IMHO its fair.
The alternative, "pick and choose" would be /hell/ for RH, faced with
customers who have a mix of machines which are and are not supported.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul(a)clubi.ie paul(a)jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam(a)dishone.st
Fortune:
He who renders warfare fatal to all engaged in it will be the greatest
benefactor the world has yet known.
-- Sir Richard Burton