On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 00:48 -0400, Doug wrote:
Well, here's my 2ยข: I think naming is dumb, *because* there is no
logical sequence to it--the reader does not know whether the named
version is current, last year's, or 2005's.
The naming is in *addition* to the release number. There's no technical
problem in giving it a name. Just, perhaps, a logistical problem if
people keep referring to names that people are unfamiliar with.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.