On 2019-12-13 07:14, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 14:53 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 12/12/19 2:47 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> That's why I suggested posting on the Evo list. The principal devel
>> hangs out there and is usually very responsive.
>>
>>> Dario, the best option would be to file a bug in bugzilla on evolution
>>> requesting to enable it.
>> Or upstream at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/issues/
> I don't understand why either of those options is useful when it's a
> specific flag set in the Fedora spec file. It has nothing to do with
> upstream.
I was referring to the apparent lack of support for TNEF, which would
count as a feature request. I presume the spec file flag is there for a
reason, e.g. that TNEF support is buggy, otherwise why turn it off?
Well, that is what
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521662
Suggested. Elsewhere folks talked about cross-scripting vulnerabilities.
And further reading suggested that the fixes were not considered adequate by
some. IMO, I think it will take a bit of convincing (with proven test cases) for those
responsible
to accept the change considering the potential security implications.
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.