From eugen at leitl.org Fri Jun 5 16:01:04 2015 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8308173704926629079==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Eugen Leitl To: users at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: fc5: install everything? Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:56:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20060328085622.GS25017@leitl.org> In-Reply-To: 1143511076.3388.13.camel@mongrel.lan.evpc.biz --===============8308173704926629079== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 12:27:56PM +1030, Tim wrote: > Discussed to death here over the last few weeks. But in summary, > "everything" never really installed "everything", and if you actually The point it took to click one checkbox to install a shitload of packages. User attention is a scarce resource. Hard drive space and bandwidth is effectively free. Time is not. > did "install" *everything* you'd have conflicts up to your earholes, not Is "conflicts up to your earlobes" supposed to be a feature? Why can't conflicts be autoresolved? Why are there conflicts in the first place? > to mention masses of updates to manage. If I asked for it, and bandwidth is no issue, I don't see why this is a problem. Please stop rationalizing deficits being features. They're not. = -- = Eugen* Leitl leitl http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE --===============8308173704926629079== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcgdjEuNC4yLjIgKEdO VS9MaW51eCkKCmlEOERCUUZFS1BvMmRiQWtRNHNwOXI0UkF2K2dBSndNdFlSLzFHdkd2eCt0Y1pT Vlc4YzQ0TnFGdHdDZ2xNYnQKc2UvQjRKeXBHUHNaRVBCNGp5cXAxMUU9Cj0wVVZ2Ci0tLS0tRU5E IFBHUCBTSUdOQVRVUkUtLS0tLQo= --===============8308173704926629079==--