nedit
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
The Numerical pad cannot be used with fedora 28.
This is an old issue, but it is still not solved.
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
3 years, 11 months
Odd ARP entry
by Jeffrey Ross
looking at the arp table on my system I see that I have one entry that
shouldn't be there -
proxy10.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.15) at 50:3d:e5:f5:b6:c0 [ether]
on enp0s25
First, the subnet this machine lives on is 172.18.19.0/24 and all of the
other arp entries are correct as they are for hosts on my subnet. The
MAC address listed for "proxy10.fedoraproject..." is my router which
tells me that my router is supplying a proxy-arp response which I'm ok
with, at least for now.
So my questions are -
1) Why is this fedora system not following the routing table to reach
209.132.181.15, there is no route other than default that would match
this network
2) More importantly why is this machine trying to reach
proxy10.fedoraproject.org ??? (currently there are no open sessions to
this destination)
System is Fedora 28 with all the latest updates, and I have no
recollection of ever configuring a fedoraproject proxy.
Jeff
3 years, 11 months
file own by 2 packages
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
Doing:
rpm -qf /usr/share/texmf
I get
texlive-base-2016-33.20160520.fc26.1.noarch
R-core-3.4.4-1.fc26.x86_64
showing that /usr/share/texmf
belongs to 2 different packages.
How can I remove it from one package?
This gives an issue when I try to update my distribution.
My Best.
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
3 years, 11 months
Bug 1577224
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
Updating from fedora 26 to feora 28, I get the error:
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/texmf conflicts between attempted installs of R-core-3.4.4-1.fc28.x86_64 and texlive-base-7:20170520-37.fc28.x86_64
It seems that it is a bug, but I am not sure that it has been solved properly.
Anyway, what should I do now?
Stop the upgade?
Remove one of the packages?
Thank.
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
3 years, 11 months
Re: lost nfs mount -
by Ed Greshko
On 07/20/18 05:58, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 07/19/18 17:42, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> The server is a Fedora system, yes? And, has it been rebooted?
> .
> Fedora 27 and 28, rebooted several times today ...
>
> I probably should have mentioned doing:
>
> [root@Box10 86data]# ss -t -l -n
> State Recv-Q Send-Q Local
> Address:Port Peer Address:Port
> LISTEN 0 128
> 0.0.0.0:60705 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN 0 128
> 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN 0 32
> 192.168.124.1:53 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN 0 128
> 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN 0 5
> 0.0.0.0:631 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN 0 128
> [::]:59745 [::]:*
> LISTEN 0 128
> [::]:111 [::]:*
> LISTEN 0 128
> [::]:22 [::]:*
> LISTEN 0 5
> [::]:631 [::]:*
>> I don't currently have a Fedora system running as a NFSv4 server...but what do you
>> get when you do this from a client?
>>
>> telnet yourserver 2049
> .
> [root@Box10 86data]# telnet 192.168.1.86 2049
> Trying 192.168.1.86...
> telnet: connect to address 192.168.1.86: Connection refused
>
>
That means the nfs server isn't running....
I have a Fedora server now up on my end running F28....
Do you have something like this?
[root@f28k-b1 ~]# systemctl status nfs
● nfs-server.service - NFS server and services
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs-server.service; enabled; vendor pre>
Drop-In: /run/systemd/generator/nfs-server.service.d
└─order-with-mounts.conf
Active: active (exited) since Fri 2018-07-20 06:10:15 CST; 13min ago
Process: 4800 ExecStart=/bin/sh -c if systemctl -q is-active gssproxy; then syst>
Process: 4787 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd $RPCNFSDARGS (code=exited, status=0/S>
Process: 4786 ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/exportfs -r (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 4800 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Jul 20 06:10:15 f28k-b1.greshko.com systemd[1]: Starting NFS server and services...
Jul 20 06:10:15 f28k-b1.greshko.com systemd[1]: Started NFS server and services.
--
Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact.
3 years, 11 months
Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers?
by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Good evening from Singapore,
I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based
SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
Relative ease of installation and configuration is an important
consideration factor.
Microsoft Exchange 2016, Domain Controller, and Active Directory are
relatively easy to install and configure. Linux-based SMTP servers are
extremely difficult to install and configure and of course, extremely
time-consuming.
One of the features of Microsoft Exchange 2016 is that you can create
additional folders on your Inbox in the server (server-side). Can
Linux-based SMTP servers do that?
Does Exchange 2016 offer more user-friendly features or Linux-based
SMTP servers?
Besides the above considerations, how about security? Traditionally,
Linux is far more secure than Windows.
Judging by security, Linux-based SMTP servers ought to have a higher percentage of the market share?
Finally, I can only use Windows Server 2016 Standard Evaluation Copy FREE for a period of 3 years MAXIMUM. But I can use Linux servers and Mail Transport Agents (MTA) FREE perpetually.
Please advise.
Thank you very much.
===BEGIN SIGNATURE===
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 30 Oct 2017
[1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/
[2] http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/
[3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming
===END SIGNATURE===
3 years, 11 months
EFI
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
I have a disk where I wish to have 2 OS on 2 different partitions
Do I need 2 EFI System Partition (Boot). I guess that one is enough.
I just want to be sure.
Thank.
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
3 years, 11 months
Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers?
by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Good evening from Singapore,
I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based
SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
Relative ease of installation and configuration is an important
consideration factor.
Microsoft Exchange 2016, Domain Controller, and Active Directory are
relatively easy to install and configure. Linux-based SMTP servers are
extremely difficult to install and configure and of course, extremely
time-consuming.
One of the features of Microsoft Exchange 2016 is that you can create
additional folders on your Inbox in the server (server-side). Can
Linux-based SMTP servers do that?
Does Exchange 2016 offer more user-friendly features or Linux-based
SMTP servers?
Besides the above considerations, how about security? Traditionally,
Linux is far more secure than Windows.
Judging by security, Linux-based SMTP servers ought to have a higher percentage of the market share?
Finally, I can only use Windows Server 2016 Standard Evaluation Copy FREE for a period of 3 years MAXIMUM. But I can use Linux servers and Mail Transport Agents (MTA) FREE perpetually.
Please advise.
Thank you very much.
===BEGIN SIGNATURE===
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 30 Oct 2017
[1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/
<https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/>[2] http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/
<http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/>[3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming
<https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming>===END SIGNATURE===
3 years, 11 months
lost nfs mount -
by Bob Goodwin
I had a power interruption this morning, everything is on UPS's but we
are raising a new puppy who gets into everythingit seems.
I have all the usual connections through my LAN but can not mount the
NFS4 server, /can ssh and sftp to it. //I/'ve tried what I can think of,
it doesn't seem to be a firewall or selinux problem. it has worked well
until the power failure. I think something is corrupted in the server
... I have a similar server running Samba which connects and runs as usual.
I could use some suggestions of where to look next.
Bob
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10 FEDORA-27/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
3 years, 11 months