seamonkey
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
Is there a plan to distribute the last version of seamonkey (2.40)
with fedora ?
Thank.
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
8 years, 1 month
howto setup docker storage on btrfs f23?
by Neal Becker
My root (and only) FS is btrfs.
sudo systemctl status docker
docker.service - Docker Application Container Engine
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/docker.service; disabled; vendor
preset: disabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Fri 2016-03-18 07:18:31 EDT; 18s
ago
Docs: http://docs.docker.com
Process: 19909 ExecStart=/usr/bin/docker daemon $OPTIONS
$DOCKER_STORAGE_OPTIONS $DOCKER_NETWORK_OPTIONS $INSECURE_REGISTRY
(code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
Main PID: 19909 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
What do I need to start docker on btrfs on f23?
8 years, 1 month
Syscall_32.tbl Missing From Kernel Source
by Stephen Morris
Hi,
I am trying to compile the kernel from the source for kernel
4.4.3-300 but the compile is failing even though I have downloaded
kcbench to get the module source code. I have looked in
arch/x86/entry/syscalls in the kernel source and syscall_32.tbl is not
there, all that is in that directory is Makefile. Have I downloaded the
wrong source package, or should I just try and find where it has been
placed in the kcbench-data directory and copy it over?
regards,
Steve
8 years, 1 month
/var/cache/PackageKit/metadata gets very big
by D. Hugh Redelmeier
On my Fedora 23 systems, /var/cache/PackageKit/metadata/updates/packages
is full of .rpm files. For example, 2.7G on my desktop.
/var/cache/PackageKit/metadata/fedora/packages has some too.
"sudo dnf clean packages" doesn't seem to change this. What does it
change?
What is the purpose of this directory of RPMs?
Why is it considered metadata?
The more obvious place would be /var/cache/PackageKit/downloads/
Why isn't this used?
Is there a way of transplanting the RPMs to another system so that
downloading could be avoided? I have half a dozen fedora systems and
it seems a waste to download each update for each system.
What is the proper way of deleting these RPMs to free up the space? I
ask because on some machines (but not all) the space is burdensome.
8 years, 1 month
conflict installing i686 version of "qt" on x86_64
by Christian Groessler
Hi,
I want to install the 32-bit version of QT on a x86_64 system (for
Skype, their Linux version seems to be quite outdated).
I'm getting this error:
--------------------------------------
# dnf install qt.i686
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:48 ago on Mon Mar 14 19:03:00 2016.
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Installing:
krb5-libs i686 1.14.1-1.fc23
updates 858 k
openssl-libs i686 1:1.0.2g-2.fc23
updates 998 k
qt i686 1:4.8.7-5.fc23 updates
5.0 M
Transaction Summary
================================================================================================================================================================================================================
Install 3 Packages
Total size: 6.8 M
Installed size: 23 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
[SKIPPED] qt-4.8.7-5.fc23.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
[SKIPPED] openssl-libs-1.0.2g-2.fc23.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
[SKIPPED] krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/doc/krb5-libs/NOTICE from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
file /usr/share/doc/krb5-libs/README from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
file /usr/share/licenses/krb5-libs/LICENSE from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man5/k5identity.5.gz from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man5/k5login.5.gz from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man5/krb5.conf.5.gz from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
Error Summary
-------------
#
--------------------------------------
Seems to be a problem that 32 and 64 versions of the krb5-libs package
claim/provide the same file.
Any idea?
regards,
chris
8 years, 1 month
last update
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
Here are 2 warning messages that I got during the last update!
warning: file /lib/modules/4.3.6-201.fc22.x86_64/updates: remove failed: No such file or directory
Disabling early microcode, because kernel does not support it. CONFIG_MICROCODE_[AMD|INTEL]_EARLY!=y
Is it normal?
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
8 years, 1 month
libreoffice 5.1.x?
by SternData
Any info on when/if LibreOffice 5.1 will be in the repos for F23?
--
-- Steve
8 years, 1 month
btrfs doesn't support filesystem swap
by Neal Becker
If I had known that, I might not have chosen btrfs for my filesystems. Came
as a rude surprise when I suddenly needed more swap space, and couldn't do
it.
8 years, 1 month
Fedora 23 - Davmail - Thunderbird - localhost blacklisted
by Robin Laing
For years I have been using Davmail on my workstation to get my email
into Thunderbird at work from Exchange Server. There is no POP access
and never could get any mapi suggestions to work.
Upgrading from F20 to F23 via a clean install of F23 and moving my home
partition to F23 and I am stuck because I cannot get my email to work.
After some diagnosis, I find that localhost is being added to a
blacklist when Thunderbird tries to connect to the davmail program via
localhost.
Someone on the Thunderbird mail list suggested that the problem is a
Fedora issue because of the x-redhat-blacklist-warning in the debugging
log I created. The relevant part is pasted here.
179783488[7fca096544a0]: add word: x-redhat-blacklist-warning:relay
66.163.179.106 is blacklisted by a rbl system
179783488[7fca096544a0]: adding word to corpus store:
x-redhat-blacklist-warning:relay 66.163.179.106 is blacklisted by a rbl
system (Trait=1) (deltaCount=1)
-296753408[7fca09654da0]: Checking blacklist for host [localhost], host
record [7fc9de6c25e0].
-296753408[7fca09654da0]: Checking blacklist for host
[webproxy.xxx.xxx], host record [7fc9e07ffc40].
-296753408[7fca09654da0]: Checking blacklist for host
[webproxy.xxx.xxx], host record [7fc9e07ffc40].
-296753408[7fca09654da0]: Checking blacklist for host
[webproxy.xxx.xxx], host record [7fc9e07ffc40].
-296753408[7fca09654da0]: Adding address to blacklist for host
[localhost], host record [7fc9de6c25e0].
-296753408[7fca09654da0]: Successfully adding address [127.0.0.1] to
blacklist for host [localhost].
I am stuck as to where this "blacklist" is coming from on my machine. I
need to get localhost into a whitelist so email will work.
What program could be creating this blacklist on my machine?
I can post mail from Thunderbird but cannot get any mail due to this
issue which is preventing me from moving to F23.
Robin
8 years, 1 month
Go back to standard kernel, after using rawhide kernel
by Andy Campbell
I've been using the rawhide kernel repo fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug, on
fedora 23.
How do I go back to using the current Fedora 23 kernel, rather than using
rawhide kernel. ( I think the latest kernel is causing issues with
Virtual Box )
If I list kernels I'm only seeing the rawhide ones
[root@kalgan ~]# dnf list kernel
Last metadata expiration check: 0:20:54 ago on Thu Mar 17 12:32:10 2016.
Installed Packages
kernel.x86_64 4.5.0-0.rc7.git2.2.fc25 @fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
kernel.x86_64 4.5.0-0.rc7.git3.2.fc25 @fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
kernel.x86_64 4.5.0-1.fc25 @fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
[root@kalgan ~]#
Thanks for any advice.
8 years, 1 month