RE: Building a 1pb volume
by J.Witvliet@mindef.nl
Never hurts to look at it.
I understood that quite some steps were taken (now at 0.53)
Some people regards the stuff from Microsoft not even "beta-grade" ;-)
Same discussion was for reiserfs and currently for btrfs.
By trying out, you can get confidence, and from the description it looks highly scalable.
Hans
From: users-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of aragonx(a)dcsnow.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 5:08 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: RE: Building a 1pb volume
> You might want to take a look at ceph:
>
> http://ceph.com/docs/master/
> http://ceph.com/ceph-storage/block-storage/
Ceph/Rados appear to still be in the beta stage. Is that not true? The 0.48 version number doesn't leave me with a lot of confidence.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
______________________________________________________________________
Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten.
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
11 years, 2 months
FC18 install - doesn't offer other OS on the drive
by Bill Davidsen
I'll see if a different subject, devoid of anything but the question, brings a
response. When I installed FC18 on a drive with FC17 and XP the installer didn't
offer an option to boot those OS as alternatives.
Is this a bug or by design.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen(a)tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
11 years, 2 months
OT: what's with the 'i'?
by Patrick O'Callaghan
Way way OT:
Just out of interest, why do some people use the non-existent word "i",
not to mention other violations of capitalization rules when 1) their
Shift key is clearly not broken, and 2) they aren't the poet e.e.
cummings? I've seen a number of people do this (admittedly a tiny
minority) and never understood it. Do they think it's cool? Are they
expressing their inner rebel? Were they punished by their English
teacher at school? Is hitting Shift too much effort? Enquiring minds
want to know.
Sorry, this has been bugging me for ages and I had just had to get this
off my chest. Feel free to ignore.
poc
11 years, 2 months
Advice needed on setting up a second DHCP network on separate Ethernet controller with access to internet
by Aaron Gray
Hi,
with the new firewalld and possible changes to Fedora. I need advice on
setting up a second DHCP network on 192.168.01.x on a separate Ethernet
controller with access to internet for http and https and DNS for the
second network from the existing 192.168.0.1 DHCP network and controller.
This is for PXEBOOT'ing new servers. I managed to do this before once on
F14 with the old Fedoras configuration and Shorewall, but could not get it
to work on F16 when I tried again. I am now wanting to do this again on
F18. And would like to ideally do it without Shorewall. And would like to
do a HOWTO to accompany the PXEBOOT HOWTO.
Hope you can help.
Many thanks in advance,
Aaron
11 years, 2 months
Display rates -
by Bob Goodwin
I've just changed a monitor and need to set the resolution to 1680 x
1050 @60Hz [ViewSonic VX2035WM].
XFCE display settings offers nothing higher than 1024 x 758 @60Hz
which it seems to default to.
The Gigabyte motherboard shows a max. of 1920 x 1200. I looked in
the BIOS settings and don't see anything I recognize as setting this
although I may have missed something I suppose.
The system runs F-18/64 and XFCE as I said. This is a new problem to
me, usually video settings just work without my attention, I haven't
used this monitor before and perhaps it does not identify itself? Dunno.
Suggestions appreciated,
Bob
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box9 Fedora-18 Linux
11 years, 2 months
Disabling SlowKeys?
by Tethys
I, along with many others, have a frequent annoyance where SlowKeys
gets enabled in the X server. Yes, I can work around it by holding
down a shift key to turn it off again. But is there any way I can
permanently disable it? Some way of configuring the X server such that
it never enables SlowKeys? I'm getting *really* fed up with it, and no
one seems to know what's turning it on. It's certainly *not* being
enabled by me holding down shift. And the bug report implies that the
X server itself isn't capable of turning it on. So it must be an
application that's doing it. However, I'm not running anything that I
wasn't running in previous Fedora releases, but I never had this
problem until F17 :-(
Tet
--
"Java is a DSL for taking large XML files and converting them to stack
traces" -- Bulat Shakirzyanov
11 years, 2 months
OT Web servers and ISP
by Roger
I have run into a gotcha with the ISP which will not provide Rails 3 on
a shared server.
Can someone please enlighten me as to why not. What are the problems?
Apologies for OT but google so far doesn't help.
TIA
Roger
11 years, 2 months
humble suggestion to Fedora developers
by Ranjan Maitra
Dear friends,
By now, it is clear that F18 has not quite matched up to expectations.
The main problem appears to be the installer. Several people here have
expressed their intent to stick to F17 and give F18 a miss. While there
is always a small proportion that appear to say this every time a new
release is put out, there is a larger issue here for Fedora itself:
several of us can not update because fedup or even fedora-upgrade does
not work (and some of us do not want to try this out because failing
would mean dealing with the installer or going back to F17). However,
Fedora needs to have people try out the distribution to work through
kinks in all the packages, otherwise F19 will be equally bad if not
worse. But without installing F18, there is no way out to this problem.
Therefore, I would like to suggest that Fedora put this current
installer (F18) in abeyance and re-roll the release using the old
installer while the new one is fixed for F19 (after responding to the
feedback generated thus far). I am not sure how an update to the
installer in F18 will help since an install is needed for an update and
once updated, there is no need for the installer. The main benefit to
Fedora for such an approach will be that all the other features
introduced in F18 can be tried and evaluated.
Best wishes,
Ranjan
--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be
deleted on receipt. For those needing to send personal or professional
e-mail, please use appropriate addresses.
____________________________________________________________
FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!
11 years, 2 months
Re: WiFi permanently disappeared after booting test kernel [SOLVED]
by Mike Fleetwood
On 31 January 2013 23:34, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko(a)greshko.com> wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 06:19 AM, Mike Fleetwood wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On my netbook I booted a test kernel 3.8.0-rc4+ I compiled. Now after
>> booting back into my regular Fedora kernel 3.6.11-5.fc17.i686.PAE my
>> wifi network device remains permanently disappeared. No wifi networks
>> displayed in Network Manager gui. Also the Network Manager syslog
>> messages make it look like the device has completely disappeared.
>>
>> Suggestions for restoring wifi welcome.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> Fragment of Network Manager syslog messages when working before
>> --8<--
>>
>> Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> WiFi enabled by radio
>> killswitch; enabled by state file
>>
>>
>> Fragment of Network Manager syslog messages when broken after
>> --8<--
>>
>> Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> WiFi disabled by
>> radio killswitch; enabled by state file
>
> yum install rfkill
>
> Then provide the output of "rfkill list"
Solved now. Bit of a brown paper bag moment. I must have unknowingly
disabled wifi, but exactly when I was testing that kernel.
Fixed by:
# yum install rfkill
# rfkill list all
0: eeepc-wlan: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: yes <-- HERE
Hard blocked: no
...
# rfkill unblock all
(Or press [Fn][F2]).
I was just a bit dismayed to see that software blocking wifi removes
the wifi device line from the output of lspci:
01:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR928X
Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express) (rev 01)
Thanks,
Mike
11 years, 2 months
AD authentication
by Will Yonker
Hi,
I've just setup a pair of Fedora 18 boxes that I could use
some help with getting them to join the active directory domain we have at
work (2008 I think). What I would like is for users in a particular
group in AD be allowed to log into the Fedora 18 boxes without me having
to create accounts (and manage passwords) on the Fedora boxes. Is
that possible?
Thanks for any help!
---
Will
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
11 years, 2 months