n00b install question
by Jim Cavera
My apologies for the (possibly) dumb question. I DL'd
the CD images and am trying to install on a Dell
Lattitude LS.
Config: Dell Lattitude LS
Pentium III, 400 MHz
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
20 years
Re: Fedora core 1 sendmail problems
by Homer Sapions
Having the same MAC address is not a problem, because the linksys has it's
own unique MAC address which it uses internally. The MAC address of the PC
LAN card is only used by the linksys as an external interface so that the
cable modem/ISP think it is still the same PC. On the inside, I have the
linksys along with 3 PCs all having their own MAC address. This setup has
worked that way for at least 3 years.
>From: roger2 <roger2(a)rogernet.net>
>Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: Fedora core 1 sendmail problems
>Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:42:30 +0100
>
>On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 22:35:59 -0500, Homer Sapions <hsapions(a)hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Thanks Alexander, I may contact you again to help with testing directly.
>>The problem is that my ISP has bound my IP address to the MAC address of
>>the first PC I attached. I can get it changed, but it may take 4 - 8
>>hours, so I have just set the linksys to masquerade as the first PCs MAC
>>address.
>So in effect if I read you right you have the same MAC address in 2 places.
>Might not be part of this problem but not best practice.
>Think about geting the IP bound to the routers MAC address.
>Regards Roger
>
>Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
>
>
>--
>fedora-list mailing list
>fedora-list(a)redhat.com
>To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
_________________________________________________________________
Get tax tips, tools and access to IRS forms all in one place at MSN Money!
http://moneycentral.msn.com/tax/home.asp
20 years
OpenSwan RPMs
by Mark Haney
Anyone know where I can get OpenSwan RPMs for FC1? I'd like to see if I
can get the newest version (2.1.1) to work connecting to my DLink firewall
at work.
--
Estne volumen in toga, an solum tibi libet me videre?
Mark Haney
Development, Systems and Network Administration
DoctorDirectory.com
http://www.doctordirectory.com
20 years
RE: Best AntiVirus for Fedora Core 1
by Chalonec Roger
Do you know if it detects Windows viruses?
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Steven Stern
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 8:47 AM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: Best AntiVirus for Fedora Core 1
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:18:31 -0500, "Chalonec Roger"
<Chalonec.Roger(a)pbgc.gov>
wrote:
>I am wondering if I need antivirus. I am using an FTP/SFTP server.
>Does ClamAV scan uploaded files that are SFTP? Do I need an OS level
>antivirus? Some have told me that Av is not needed on Linux. I am not
>planning on running windows stores. A user will send a file to the
>server with SFTP and a user will retrieve the file via SFTP. However,
>both users will likely be using windows based systems.
>
>Thanks for your time.
>
It seems to me that anything you can do to make it hard to spread
viruses on your network will have a payoff. It may not help you, the
*nix admin, but it will help the people using your server.
I'm using ClamAV on my little mail server. You can install ClamAV and
have it manually scan the system (or selected directories) on a regular
basis, write a script to scan files as soon as the SFTP completes, or
use the "clamuko" module to have real-time background scanning running
in those directories.
--
Steve
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
20 years
yum x RPM x massaging file systems (but which dir ?)
by Thiers Botelho
Hi all,
Some time ago I sent this to the list:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-February/msg03916.html
It went by unanswered, and I also didn't myself have any time since then
for further investigation.
Lately I got the idea that it's RPM, not yum, requiring additional file
system space.
I suppose that the space required would be used on some work directory
used by RPM on the update process.
Since this machine is a multi-boot one in a cramped HD, I'd like to find
out which specific directory would need to be expanded, so that I could
move it to its own brand-new stretchable n' squeezable filesystem [good
old Partition Magic to the rescue - ;) ].
No luck on my googling for which dir would be this one (actually I'm not
so sure of what to search). Tried 'Maximum RPM' and some other docs on RPM
and I'm still clueless.
Help anyone ?
Thiers
20 years
old topic fc1 dvd i know! :-}
by Chadley Wilson
any one come up with a script for making a dvd iso for fc1 yet?
Chadley Wilson
Production PLanner / Analyst and Supervisor
A division of Technobyte (Pty) Ltd. Registration No. 1993/00917/07
Email: chadley(a)pinteq.co.za
Tel: +27 11 265 3000 (Switchboard) or 265 3195 (Direct) 083 342 3730
(Cell)
Fax: + 27 11 265 3073
Web site: www.pinnacle.co.za
WARNING: The information transmitted herewith is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information
by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete all
copies of the material.
20 years
wtmp log empty on FC1
by Pedro Fernandes Macedo
I'm trying to figure out what is going on here.. I`ve upgraded a redhat 9 machine to FC1 and the wtmp file is empty.. I've restarted syslog , rebooted the machine and nothing worked... If I run last , I have this:
[root@jade etc]# last
wtmp begins Thu Mar 18 16:38:21 2004
[root@jade etc]#
the permissions seem to be right:
0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root utmp 0 Mar 18 16:38 wtmp
0 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root utmp 0 Fev 20 11:15 wtmp.1x
This machine is heavilly used , so I'm sure that the wtmp file should have lots of entries already...
Any ideas?
--------------------
Pedro Fernandes Macedo
20 years
RE: About RULE for FC1, was: 486 install?
by Thomas King
>
>Yes, currently RULE is "stuck" to Red Hat 9. The reason is simply that
>I moved to a new apartment (as in"still living with cardboard boxes in
>the living room...") and the other developers had, AFAIK, similar
>offline problems at the same time.
>I suggest that you subscribe to the RULE list and post there
>an "is anybody working on FC1?"
I looked over your website and cannot find any of the downloads, even for
RH9. I take it there won't be any until all of the developers are settled
back in. I'd love to try this out for a small charter school whose network
I'm working on. They have a bunch of 133MHz white boxes that I want to use
as non-essential file servers.
Tom King
_________________________________________________________________
Get tax tips, tools and access to IRS forms all in one place at MSN Money!
http://moneycentral.msn.com/tax/home.asp
20 years
Fedora Core 1.91: apt-get upgrade error: unsigned package(s)
by Weirong Zhu
My current system is Fedora Core 1.
I use apt-get to upgrade packages.
my apt version is 0.5.15cnc5
Now I am trying to upgrade my system to Fedora Core 1.91
However, When I did the apt-get upgrade: I got bellow error informations:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
731 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 removed and 98 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/739MB of archives.
After unpacking 254MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
Checking GPG signatures...
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libselinux_1.8-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libattr_2.4.1-3_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libacl_2.2.7-4_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/hwdata_0.114-1_noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/hotplug_3%3a2004%5f03%5f11-1_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/pcre-devel_4.5-2_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/pcre_4.5-2_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gpm_1.20.1-45_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/modutils_2.4.26-14_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/net-tools_1.60-24_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/initscripts_7.49-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/shadow-utils_2%3a4.0.3-21_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OKUnsigned
/var/cache/apt/archives/vim-minimal_1%3a6.2.403-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5
OKUnsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/GConf2-devel_2.6.0-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/GConf2_2.6.0-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/Guppi_0.40.3-18_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/binutils_2.15.90.0.1.1-2_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/a2ps_4.13b-37_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/arpwatch_14%3a2.1a13-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libbonobo-devel_2.6.0-2_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libbonobo_2.6.0-2_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gdb_6.0post-0.20040223.14_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OKUnsigned
/var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-smp#2.6.4-1.300_2.6.4-1.300_i686.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/dhcp_1%3a3.0.1rc12-4_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/glibc-headers_2.3.3-20_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/fedora-logos_1.1.23-1_noarch.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-mime-data_2.4.1-3_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gtksourceview_0.9.2-2_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/less_382-3_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/net-snmp-utils_5.1.1-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/net-snmp-perl_5.1.1-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/net-snmp_5.1.1-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned
/var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-source#2.6.4-1.300_2.6.4-1.300_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-utils_1%3a2.4-9.1.126_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libpcap_14%3a0.8.2-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/man_1.5m2-5_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/neon_0.24.4-4_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/netpbm-devel_10.19-7_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/netpbm-progs_10.19-7_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/netpbm_10.19-7_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/nscd_2.3.3-20_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/nss%5fldap_217-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/rp-pppoe_3.5-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned
/var/cache/apt/archives/rpmdb-fedora_1%3a1.91-0.20040331_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/samba-swat_0%3a3.0.3-1.pre1_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/samba-client_0%3a3.0.3-1.pre1_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/samba_0%3a3.0.3-1.pre1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/samba-common_0%3a3.0.3-1.pre1_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/slocate_2.7-8_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tcpdump_14%3a3.8.2-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-fonts_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-afm_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-dvips_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-latex_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-xdvi_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/vnc_4.0-1.beta4.9_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/vnc-server_4.0-1.beta4.9_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-common_1%3a6.2.403-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned
/var/cache/apt/archives/anaconda-runtime_9.92-0.20040331011453_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/aumix_2.8-8_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/cdrdao_1.1.8-3_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/ftpcopy_0.6.2-6_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/glibc-profile_2.3.3-20_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gpm-devel_1.20.1-45_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gstreamer-tools_0.8.0-3_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/htdig_3.2.0b5-7_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-doc_2.6.4-1.300_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/sylpheed_0.9.10-2_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-doc_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-X11_1%3a6.2.403-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-enhanced_1%3a6.2.403-1_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/xinitrc_3.39-1_noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
E: Error: 73 unsigned package(s)
0 package(s)s with unknown signatures
0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signatures
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I have imported all the keys as I know.
Any idea for the error I got?
Thanks very much!
my mirror-list now is :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rpm http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/fedora/fedora/ fedora/1.91/i386 os
updates
rpm-src http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/fedora/fedora/ fedora/1.91/i386
os updates
# Fedora Core (Kernel.org, San Francisco California, USA)
rpm http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 os updates
rpm-src http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 os
updates
# Fedora Core (University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii, USA)
rpm http://download.fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 os updates
rpm-src http://download.fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 os updates
# Fedora Extras (University of Southern California, USA)
rpm http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/fedora/fedora/ fedora/1.91/i386 stable
rpm-src http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/fedora/fedora/ fedora/1.91/i386
stable
# Fedora Extras (Kernel.org, San Francisco California, USA)
rpm http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 stable
rpm-src http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 stable
# Macromedia (USA East, Rutgers University, New Jersey)
rpm http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/macromedia/apt fedora/1 macromedia
rpm-src http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/macromedia/apt fedora/1 macromedia
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
20 years
building rpm from tar.gz od bz2
by Michal Zeravik
Hi to all,
I red in rpmbuild manual It's possible to build
binary package from tar archive.
All I need is to pass right arguments to ./configure script,
make and build rpm package.
Does exist any simple way to do it without spec file?
For example build rpm after make.
michalz
20 years