tuna-devel June 2020

tuna-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

6 participants
5 discussions

[PATCH 1/2] python-linux-procfs: Fix import of utilist
by John Kacur 24 Jun '20

24 Jun '20

If procfs/utilist.py is not in your PYTHONPATH, the import can fail. Specify it fully. Reported-by: David Runge <dave(a)sleepmap.de> Suggested-by: Guy Streeter <guy.streeter(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur(a)redhat.com> --- procfs/procfs.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/procfs/procfs.py b/procfs/procfs.py index a586ae2b0156..3cfa941ffdb9 100755 --- a/procfs/procfs.py +++ b/procfs/procfs.py @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ import os, time from functools import reduce from six.moves import range -from utilist import bitmasklist +from procfs.utilist import bitmasklist import platform import re -- 2.21.3

1 1

[PATCH 01/13] python-linux-procfs: bitmasklist_test.py: python3 changes
by John Kacur 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

Only python3 is supported now Changes to python3 - Specify python3 on the shebang - Get rid of future - Apply optional ws_comma from 2to3 Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur(a)redhat.com> --- bitmasklist_test.py | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/bitmasklist_test.py b/bitmasklist_test.py index 60a8da33c77f..4519946858f1 100755 --- a/bitmasklist_test.py +++ b/bitmasklist_test.py @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -#!/usr/bin/python -from __future__ import print_function +#!/usr/bin/python3 + from procfs import bitmasklist class bitmasklist_test: @@ -52,17 +52,17 @@ t.bitmasklist_test() # CPU 0, 32 t = \ - bitmasklist_test("00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000001,00000001", 44, [0,32]) + bitmasklist_test("00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000001,00000001", 44, [0, 32]) t.bitmasklist_test() # cpu 0-15 t = \ - bitmasklist_test("ffff", 44, [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]) + bitmasklist_test("ffff", 44, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]) t.bitmasklist_test() #cpu 0-71 t = \ - bitmasklist_test("ff,ffffffff,ffffffff", 96, [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71]) + bitmasklist_test("ff,ffffffff,ffffffff", 96, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71]) t.bitmasklist_test() exit(bitmasklist_test.unit_test_result) -- 2.21.3

3 14

Inconsistency with tuna isolate command on s390x architecture
by Aniket Khisti 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

Hello, There seems to be a bug while trying to isolate CPU using tuna- utility on RHEL8 s380x architecture. Would it be possible to accommodate this- bugfix in any upcoming releases? I appreciate your help in advance, Thanks! Observed issue - [root@ibm-z-137 ~]# tuna --cpus=1 --isolate Function: isolate_cpus , Invalid argument [root@ibm-z-137 ~]# tuna --cpus 1 --isolate Function: isolate_cpus , Invalid argument Expected - [root@localhost ~]# tuna --cpus=1 --isolate # no output, means works fine root@localhost ~]# tuna --cpus 1 --isolate # no output, means works fine Issue Environment - [root@ibm-z-137 ~]# uname -a Linux ibm-z-137.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com 4.18.0-193.el8.s390x #1 SMP Fri Mar 27 14:43:09 UTC 2020 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux [root@ibm-z-137 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.2 (Ootpa) [root@ibm-z-137 tuna]# dnf whatprovides tuna tuna-0.14-4.el8.noarch : Application tuning GUI & command line utility Repo : @System Matched from: Provide : tuna = 0.14-4.el8

2 1

[PATCH] python-linux-procfs: Create release 0.6.2
by John Kacur 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

Release 0.6.2 Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur(a)redhat.com> --- rpm/SPECS/python-linux-procfs.spec | 7 ++++++- setup.py | 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rpm/SPECS/python-linux-procfs.spec b/rpm/SPECS/python-linux-procfs.spec index 828f1bc25940..6103cbff8c19 100644 --- a/rpm/SPECS/python-linux-procfs.spec +++ b/rpm/SPECS/python-linux-procfs.spec @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ %endif Name: python-linux-procfs -Version: 0.6.1 +Version: 0.6.2 Release: 1%{?dist} License: GPLv2 Summary: Linux /proc abstraction classes @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %endif %changelog +* Mon Jun 22 2020 John Kacur <jkacur(a)redhat.com> - 0.6.2-1 +- Add bitmasklist_test +- clean-ups for recent python formating regarding spacing, tabs, etc +- Fix to parse the number of cpus correctly on s390(x) + * Fri Jan 11 2019 Jiri Kastner <jkastner(a)redhat.com> - 0.6.1-1 - python3 fixes diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py index 82e6bc433b06..f1918fc50fd0 100755 --- a/setup.py +++ b/setup.py @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ if isfile("MANIFEST"): PYTHONLIB = join(get_python_lib(standard_lib=1, prefix=''), 'site-packages') setup(name="python-linux-procfs", - version = "0.6.1", + version = "0.6.2", description = "Linux /proc abstraction classes", author = "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo", author_email = "acme(a)redhat.com", -- 2.21.3

2 1

Inconsistency with tuna isolate command on s390x architecture
by Aniket Khisti 10 Jun '20

10 Jun '20

Hello, There seems to be a bug while trying to isolate CPU using tuna- utility on RHEL8 s380x architecture. Would it be possible to accommodate this- bugfix in any upcoming releases? appreciate the efforts, Thanks! Observed issue - [root@ibm-z-137 ~]# tuna --cpus=1 --isolate Function: isolate_cpus , Invalid argument [root@ibm-z-137 ~]# tuna --cpus 1 --isolate Function: isolate_cpus , Invalid argument Expected - [root@localhost ~]# tuna --cpus=1 --isolate # no output, means works fine [root@localhost ~]# tuna --cpus 1Thanks, --isolate # no output, means works fine Issue Environment - [root@ibm-z-137 ~]# uname -a Linux ibm-z-137.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com 4.18.0-193.el8.s390x #1 SMP Fri Mar 27 14:43:09 UTC 2020 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux [root@ibm-z-137 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.2 (Ootpa) [root@ibm-z-137 tuna]# dnf whatprovides tuna tuna-0.14-4.el8.noarch : Application tuning GUI & command line utility Repo : @System Matched from: Provide : tuna = 0.14-4.el8 -- Aniket Khisti

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

tuna-devel June 2020