[Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607
Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jkeating(a)redhat.com
Blocks|446452(F11Blocker) |
--- Comment #31 from Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> 2009-04-13 20:21:44 EDT ---
This should be fixed for F11, I'm dropping it from the blocker, but leaving the
bug open for somebody a bit more knowledgeable of the situation to close or
whatever.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Bug 309191] ExcludeArch: ppc64 - can't build - Mono doesn't exist
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309191
Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rawhide |10
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |FutureFeature
CC| |a.badger(a)gmail.com
Version|10 |rawhide
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:59:53 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Bug 247082] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247082
Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |ERRATA
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2009-04-13 10:09:32 EDT ---
Build in rawhide addresses this issue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Bug 192402] shouldn't require 'cups'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192402
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mlichvar(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> 2009-04-13 10:07:41 EDT ---
Ping?
The same may apply to the dbus dependency.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Bug 247082] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247082
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|matthias(a)rpmforge.net |limb(a)jcomserv.net
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-04-13 08:23:15 EDT ---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Bug 189676] Synaptics driver not functioning when the h/w is a Synaptics-cPad
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189676
--- Comment #29 from Mace Moneta <mmoneta(a)optonline.net> 2009-04-12 21:33:36 EDT ---
That's the mystery. The GPL driver has been available for 5 years now, and
I've been using it since it first came into existence without issue.
Greg KH has had the driver on his "out-of-tree drivers that need to be looked
at" list for 2 years, and indicates he has hundreds of volunteers with nothing
to do.
The author of the driver wants to get it into the kernel tree.
And yet, here we sit with end-users having to compile a driver to get their
touchpad to work. It all seems odd.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Bug 220962] laptop hibernates when secondary battery runs out; primary battery still full
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220962
Jason D. Clinton <me(a)jasonclinton.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |me(a)jasonclinton.com
--- Comment #8 from Jason D. Clinton <me(a)jasonclinton.com> 2009-04-12 21:18:24 EDT ---
This bug is still present in Fedora 11 (Rawhide). Please reopen.
Unfortunately, there appears to be nothing logged in the usual locations and
I'm not sure what handles power events like this in Fedora. I just installed
Fedora coming from Debian Unstable on the same kernel version (2.6.29) with
roughly the same version of acpid and it did not have this issue so I imagine
that this is some Fedora-specific power event handler.
I checked /etc/acpi/* and it doesn't appear that any battery-specific events or
event handlers. I don't know how /usr/libexec/hald-addon-acpi fits in to all of
this.
If this is g-p-m, it is odd that Debian finds a way to do this correctly in
spite of also using g-p-m for power management. This is the only significant
patch that I see that Debian has applied versus upstream g-p-m:
http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/gnome-power-manager/2....
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months