Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202135
Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |UPSTREAM
External Bug ID| |PADL Software 382
--- Comment #6 from Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-17 18:08:20 EDT ---
nss_ldap doesn't have much use for nsRole -- the filters used for looking up
entries are already customizable, not that I'd recommend doing that.
Submitting a patch to add an additional access check to pam_ldap, using the
"pam_nsrole" configuration setting as a means of specifying a role that the
user's entry must have, and closing the bug report here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245784
Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|piotrdrag(a)gmail.com |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229469
--- Comment #29 from csb sysadmin <admin(a)structbio.vanderbilt.edu> 2008-11-17 17:48:49 EDT ---
and yes the test program would run locally but not over NFS.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229469
csb sysadmin <admin(a)structbio.vanderbilt.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |admin(a)structbio.vanderbilt.
| |edu
--- Comment #28 from csb sysadmin <admin(a)structbio.vanderbilt.edu> 2008-11-17 17:45:46 EDT ---
I don't know if what we experienced has anything to do with thie problem, but
we had a RHEL5 system running 2.6.18-92.1.1 and after a 138 day uptime, the NFS
server stopped being able to complete fcntl64(..., F_GETLK, .. calls or
fcntl64(255, F_GETFL) calls in strace. For users whose home directories were on
this server, these users could not start firefox, thunderbird, openoffice, many
KDE apps, etc and I couldn't run this test script no matter which of the 35+
other RHEL4 and RHEL5 NFS clients I tried :
#!/bin/sh
(
flock -x 200
uname -a >> allHosts.txt
) 200>> lockFile
It would just hang. Eventually we had to reboot the NFS server, re-starting NFS
didn't help, and I don't think there is anyway to re-start [lockd] since it's a
kernel level process.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201614
Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|piotrdrag(a)gmail.com |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248315
Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|piotrdrag(a)gmail.com |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205011
Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-17 17:02:29 EDT ---
Closing all bugs that have been in modified for over a month. Please reopen if
the bug is not actually fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588
--- Comment #26 from Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-17 15:38:34 EDT ---
How about changing it to an append and then we could allow it. Allowing any
confined domain to write to rpm.log could cover up the fact that a confined
domain installed a package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202135
Guil Barros <gbarros(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gbarros(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Guil Barros <gbarros(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-17 11:18:36 EDT ---
I have the same need. It would be beneficial if nss_ldap were able to restrict
user access based on nsRole. This would be similar to the current pam_groupdn
option in ldap.conf but much more flexible.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230856
Bruce Korb <bkorb(a)gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(bkorb(a)gnu.org) |
--- Comment #16 from Bruce Korb <bkorb(a)gnu.org> 2008-11-17 11:06:35 EDT ---
Debarshi, ack?
autogen-libopts-devel requires both autogen and autogen-libopts.
autogen requires autogen-libopts to run and autogen-libopts-devel to build.
autogen-libopts is required by any package that requires
autogen-libopts-devel to build.
Yes, indeedy, there is a circular dependency. These packages
are co-dependent. I refer you to comment #13. One big ball of
wax may violate Red Hat guidelines, but it surely makes the
interdependency mess a lot more tractable.
That all now said, I think you all get to decide what works best
for your distribution. Just the one caveat that if folks wind up
installing autogen and autogen-libopts and are not warned to install
autogen-libopts-devel, you will see some complaints.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.