Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229469
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust(a)netapp.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trond.myklebust(a)netapp.com
--- Comment #24 from Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust(a)netapp.com> 2008-10-27 12:36:13 EDT ---
Michael,
Have you been running the test with lockd listening on a UDP port?
As you noted in comment #13, NetApp filers only send NLM callbacks over UDP, so
on FC-9, you would need to add something like
lockd.nlm_udpport=40000
(or some other unused port number) to your grub.conf's kernel boot parameters.
Without this, you are indeed likely to see your test case fail to grab a
contended lock.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209110
Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hdegoede(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #12 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-27 10:23:27 EDT ---
Hi Mark,
I'm a new anaconda developer currently working on iscsi support in Fedora and
as such looking at open iscsi related bugs.
What you are seeing here are 2 different problems:
1) The device name of iscsi disks is not stable
This is not something which we are going to fix, with things like usb disks,
motherboard with a zillion sata connectors, etc. device names will not be
stable. This is the new dynamic hotplug / udev Linux world.
Solution: use a label or uuid for /
2) mkinitrd resolves a label / uuid to a device name and puts this in the
initrd, given 1) we really should stop doing this. I think we've not stopped
doing this thus far, because the rootdev option to mkrootdev (in the ramdisk
init script) gets ignored when a root= parameter gets passed to the kernel, and
by default (when using grub) we always pass a root= parameter, so the rootdev
parameter in the initscript doesn't matter much in the default case.
I believe thus that this bug should be renamed:
"mkrootdev gets passed /dev/foo as rootdev while root should be found by LABEL
or UUID"
Peter do you agree?
In the mean time you should be able to fix the issue reported here by passing
root=LABEL=somelabel to the kernel when booting.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244431
Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED
Blocks|438943 |
--- Comment #19 from Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-27 10:08:26 EDT ---
If the Everything repo is marked as enabled=1 in /etc/yum.repos.d/whatever,
then yes it will be enabled by default. However we do not have the repo
selection screen enabled for upgrades at the moment. There are other open bugs
for that.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220983
Mihai Harpau <mishu(a)piatafinanciara.ro> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mishu(a)piatafinanciara.ro
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220983
--- Comment #6 from sean <seandarcy(a)hotmail.com> 2008-10-26 11:06:27 EDT ---
Still a bug on F10, updated to Oct 26.
evince-2.24.1-1.fc10.i386
mangles it, acroread shows it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203642
Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|9 |rawhide
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355861
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2008-10-24 19:49:18 EDT ---
rpmlint-0.85-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rpmlint'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9125
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244431
--- Comment #18 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-24 15:46:30 EDT ---
IIRC, the original bug isn't about enabling updates vs. not enabling updates,
it's about doing an upgrade from the DVD, when you have packages installed that
are from the Everything repo but not in the DVD set. Do we enable that as well
on upgrades?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253149
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
CC| |notting(a)redhat.com
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #12 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-24 15:43:44 EDT ---
Verified.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251098
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |notting(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-24 15:16:04 EDT ---
Looks like this needs to be http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/sources-stable/ ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.