Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182464
Daniel Qarras <dqarras(a)yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|dqarras(a)yahoo.com |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446294
--- Comment #17 from Greg Metcalfe <metcalfegreg(a)qwest.net> 2008-10-13 15:58:24 EDT ---
Well, I rebooted before my last post, to give the best test I could. Just did
it again, same result. Grabbed the -19 pkg again, but it has the same sha1sum
as the first one I tested. So I don't know what to say.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446294
--- Comment #16 from Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-13 15:08:53 EDT ---
Greg,
The man page should be updated, since it is generated from the output of ls
--help, and since the patch updated ls's usage function, maybe your man page is
out of date:
$ ./ls --help|tail -8
Exit status:
0 if OK,
1 if minor problems (e.g., failure to access a file or directory not
specified as a command line argument
2 if serious trouble (e.g., memory exhausted, invalid option or failure
to access a file or directory specified as a command line argument).
so you should definitely have the right content.
Hmm... but looking at the generated man page, I saw ugly formatting.
So I've just checked in another change to fix that. Here's what I see now:
$ nroff -man man/ls.1|grep -B1 -A7 'if OK'
Exit status:
0 if OK,
1 if minor problems (e.g., failure to access a file or directory
not specified as a command line argument,
2 if serious trouble (e.g., memory exhausted, invalid option or
failure to access a file or directory specified as a command
line argument).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282001
Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC| |hdegoede(a)redhat.com
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-13 14:26:46 EDT ---
Short intro: I've recently begun as an iscsi-initiator-utils co-maintainer and
as such I'm looking into all open bugs.
iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.870-0.1.rc1.fc10 which will be in tomorrows rawhide
has rewritten initscripts, which no longer have the string in question,
closing.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446294
Greg Metcalfe <metcalfegreg(a)qwest.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #15 from Greg Metcalfe <metcalfegreg(a)qwest.net> 2008-10-13 14:21:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Thanks for the report.
> Fixed upstream with this patch:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.bugs/14764/focus=14813
I prefer your wording to mine in the info page. The man page hasn't been
changed:
$ man ls | col -b | tail -n 27 | head -n 1
Exit status is 0 if OK, 1 if minor problems, 2 if serious trouble.
I'd obviously prefer it to have been fixed in the man page as well, but this is
good enough.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228744
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |UPSTREAM
External Bug ID| |GNU Compiler Collection
| |29628
--- Comment #9 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-13 11:02:51 EDT ---
It is fixed in the current upstream snapshot:
GNU C (GCC) version 4.4.0 20081007 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.4.0 20081007 (experimental), GMP version
4.2.2, MPFR version 2.3.1.
Breakpoint 1, getargs (argc=1, argv=0xffffc514) at rh228744.c:5
5 printf ( "argc %d\n", argc ); /* set breakpoint here */
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc.i686
(gdb) bt
#0 getargs (argc=1, argv=0xffffc514) at rh228744.c:5
#1 0x0804844e in main (argc=1, argv=0xffffc514) at rh228744.c:14
(gdb) n
argc 1
6 printf ( "filename %s\n", argv[1] );
(gdb) bt
#0 getargs (argc=1, argv=0xffffc514) at rh228744.c:6
#1 0x0804844e in main (argc=1, argv=0xffffc514) at rh228744.c:14
Closing this Bug as not so serious while it should be present in Fedora
gcc-4.4.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237553
Kamil Dudka <kdudka(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kdudka(a)redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446294
Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |meyering(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #13 from Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-13 03:12:37 EDT ---
Thanks for the report.
Fixed upstream with this patch:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.bugs/14764/focus=14813
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250881
John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #22 from John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-12 16:52:54 EDT ---
This bug has been triaged
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.