Is it just me, or are the stats for comps and comps-legacy mixed up on the FLP website?
Also, any chance of opening up CVS access to comps, or should we just keep waiting for Transifex?
Regards, Miloš
Στις 08-09-2007, ημέρα Σαβ, και ώρα 23:05 +0100, ο/η Miloš Komarčević έγραψε:
Is it just me, or are the stats for comps and comps-legacy mixed up on the FLP website?
They are correct AFAICT. The comps module hosted on elvis is deprecated and kept only for RHEL. The current ones are those on the Fedora CVS.
I just updated the module info on the page and changed '/cvs/extras/' to '/cvs/pkgs' for clarity.
Also, any chance of opening up CVS access to comps, or should we just keep waiting for Transifex?
We enabled access on '/cvs/pkgs/comps' some days ago [1]. If it doesn't work, give a shout.
-d
[1]:https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/75
On 9/8/07, Dimitris Glezos dimitris@glezos.com wrote:
Στις 08-09-2007, ημέρα Σαβ, και ώρα 23:05 +0100, ο/η Miloš Komarčević έγραψε:
Is it just me, or are the stats for comps and comps-legacy mixed up on the FLP website?
They are correct AFAICT. The comps module hosted on elvis is deprecated and kept only for RHEL. The current ones are those on the Fedora CVS.
Sure, but isn't that comps-legacy? AFAICT that's the one that has a big number of 100% completed translations of 270 messages and is on elvis and i18n.redhat.com stats page. The FLP stats say otherwise:
http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/comps-legacy
Comps in fp.o CVS is current and has 217 messages and no 100% completion as it was not opened up until recently, but FLP stats again say otherwise:
http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/comps
The mixup is definitely there - either in module naming, or in their description/location, or in my head ;)
We enabled access on '/cvs/pkgs/comps' some days ago [1]. If it doesn't work, give a shout.
Seems to work ok, thanks! First time I see messages about obtaining a lock on the file though...
Regards, Miloš
Στις 09-09-2007, ημέρα Κυρ, και ώρα 01:06 +0100, ο/η Miloš Komarčević έγραψε:
On 9/8/07, Dimitris Glezos dimitris@glezos.com wrote:
Στις 08-09-2007, ημέρα Σαβ, και ώρα 23:05 +0100, ο/η Miloš Komarčević έγραψε:
Is it just me, or are the stats for comps and comps-legacy mixed up on the FLP website?
They are correct AFAICT. The comps module hosted on elvis is deprecated and kept only for RHEL. The current ones are those on the Fedora CVS.
Sure, but [...] The mixup is definitely there - either in module naming, or in their description/location, or in my head ;)
I think we both agree that we should translate comps @ cvs.fpo:/cvs/pkgs and that the other one (comps @ elvis, named comps-legacy) is deprecated. :)
Now, the statistics are a bit broken so don't rely on them to compare. Just make sure you translate the module at /cvs/extras. I'll try to find some time in the next days to look into the broken statistics.. *sigh*
We enabled access on '/cvs/pkgs/comps' some days ago [1]. If it doesn't work, give a shout.
Seems to work ok, thanks! First time I see messages about obtaining a lock on the file though...
Is the output of a VCS operation on a module on /cvs/docs different than on one on /cvs/pkgs? If yes, maybe opening a ticket on infra with the outputs could shed some light on the case.
-d
On 9/9/07, Dimitris Glezos dimitris@glezos.com wrote:
I think we both agree that we should translate comps @ cvs.fpo:/cvs/pkgs and that the other one (comps @ elvis, named comps-legacy) is deprecated. :)
Yep
Now, the statistics are a bit broken so don't rely on them to compare. Just make sure you translate the module at /cvs/extras. I'll try to find some time in the next days to look into the broken statistics.. *sigh*
No pressure ;) Just wanted to make sure you're aware of it.
Is the output of a VCS operation on a module on /cvs/docs different than on one on /cvs/pkgs? If yes, maybe opening a ticket on infra with the outputs could shed some light on the case.
Can't remember /cvs/docs commit output right now, will keep an eye on it next time.
Thanks, Miloš