On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Was there supposed to be a step where the old repositories were
removed from elvis?
According to the final elvis move plan, we did.
We ran into a case today where for one module
the only thing that was done is that at some point the translations
were 'cvs rm'd, leaving all the code there (which, by the way, is
a horribly broken way to try to disable the repo). Development was still
going on in the elvis repository, and now we have divergent trees.
Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)