Hi together,
i just tried to commit some changes to the moved elvis specspo (now located at /cvs/elvis/specspo. But im currently not allowed
[15:10] <mmcgrath> petreu: you're not in the "specspo" group to commit. [15:10] <petreu> hmm [15:11] <mmcgrath> technically "cvsspecspo"
Who do i have to sleep with to get access to that group. Or is it restricted to the transifex system.
Specspo files are pretty big so its much more comfortable to commit them via cvs.
greetings Peter
Peter Reuschlein schrieb:
Hi together,
i just tried to commit some changes to the moved elvis specspo (now located at /cvs/elvis/specspo. But im currently not allowed
[15:10] <mmcgrath> petreu: you're not in the "specspo" group to commit. [15:10] <petreu> hmm [15:11] <mmcgrath> technically "cvsspecspo"
Who do i have to sleep with to get access to that group. Or is it restricted to the transifex system.
Specspo files are pretty big so its much more comfortable to commit them via cvs.
greetings Peter
-- Fedora-trans-list mailing list Fedora-trans-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
you may ignore this email, took pretty long to go through already had a talk with glezos, the topic is on the agenda for the meeting this evening
greetings Peter
Peter Reuschlein ha scritto:
..... Specspo files are pretty big so its much more comfortable to commit them via cvs. ....
+1
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Peter Reuschlein fedora-ml@reuschlein.de wrote:
Hi together,
i just tried to commit some changes to the moved elvis specspo (now located at /cvs/elvis/specspo. But im currently not allowed
[15:10] <mmcgrath> petreu: you're not in the "specspo" group to commit. [15:10] <petreu> hmm [15:11] <mmcgrath> technically "cvsspecspo"
Who do i have to sleep with to get access to that group. Or is it restricted to the transifex system.
Specspo files are pretty big so its much more comfortable to commit them via cvs.
Submitting to specspo should work fine via Transifex. If not, please let me know.
In terms of command line: We discussed this briefly in the meeting, and I also got Infra's feedback. Permissions to a repo is not something we can decide -- it's the maintainer's call. If some translators feel more comfortable using the command line for specspo (and any other module), they can request membership to the respective FAS group (in this case cvsspecspo). This is something a translator could always do, and will be able to do. Transifex doesn't substitute our existing processes, it only allows us to overcome this step of creating accounts.
Technically we could do it if it's very important, but it will put more work on Infra, something I'm trying to avoid as much as possible. Since the web interface works, until the CLI lands, I'd suggest to keep things simple and work with the existing solutions we have.
-d
Dimitris Glezos wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Peter Reuschlein fedora-ml@reuschlein.de wrote:
Hi together,
i just tried to commit some changes to the moved elvis specspo (now located at /cvs/elvis/specspo. But im currently not allowed
[15:10] <mmcgrath> petreu: you're not in the "specspo" group to commit. [15:10] <petreu> hmm [15:11] <mmcgrath> technically "cvsspecspo"
Who do i have to sleep with to get access to that group. Or is it restricted to the transifex system.
Specspo files are pretty big so its much more comfortable to commit them via cvs.
Submitting to specspo should work fine via Transifex. If not, please let me know.
Just I would like to share my little discovery this morning, if you have same question where are they.
We can submit both desc and summary under Destination File of Specspo, there are desc/ja.po and summary/ja.po to choose. If you create new, follow the structure.
noriko
In terms of command line: We discussed this briefly in the meeting, and I also got Infra's feedback. Permissions to a repo is not something we can decide -- it's the maintainer's call. If some translators feel more comfortable using the command line for specspo (and any other module), they can request membership to the respective FAS group (in this case cvsspecspo). This is something a translator could always do, and will be able to do. Transifex doesn't substitute our existing processes, it only allows us to overcome this step of creating accounts.
Technically we could do it if it's very important, but it will put more work on Infra, something I'm trying to avoid as much as possible. Since the web interface works, until the CLI lands, I'd suggest to keep things simple and work with the existing solutions we have.
-d
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Noriko Mizumoto noriko@redhat.com wrote:
Submitting to specspo should work fine via Transifex. If not, please let me know.
Just I would like to share my little discovery this morning, if you have same question where are they.
We can submit both desc and summary under Destination File of Specspo, there are desc/ja.po and summary/ja.po to choose. If you create new, follow the structure.
I updated the name of the module to "specspo (desc+summary)" to make this more clear.
-d
-
Dimitris Glezos -
Francesco Tombolini -
Noriko Mizumoto -
Peter Reuschlein