2018-02-20 22:06 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste <jean-baptiste(a)holcroft.fr>:
Le 18/02/2018 à 18:38, Piotr Drąg a écrit :
>
> Other language and l10n-requests are still useful, but the rest should
> be disabled/removed, in my opinion. Maybe we can change the
> description of the latter from the current “Requests for new Fedora
> Localization, and other miscellaneous work” to “Bugs related to the
> Fedora Localization Project as a whole” or similar.
Hi, I also think we can disable these trackers.
When I produce a report using every component of the "Fedora
Localization" product [1], I see 10 bugs opened since 2017-01-01.
Shouldn't we consider going further and disabling every
language-specific Bugzilla components?
Having one single localization place to issues would probably makes it
easier for follow-up.
While Bugzilla worked fine for years, many projects (docs, websites,
etc.) uses Pagure. Shouldn't we consider moving all of our tracking in
Pagure and find a way to advertise it in Bugzilla?
Or can we create some kind of bridge (allow creating, and automatically
clone the ticket on Pagure, then close the bug on Bugzilla with comment)?
Individual components for languages allow these communities to
subscribe to only their bugs. We can’t have a single “translation
bugs” component, I’d be an unmaintainable nightmare.
I also think it’s advantageous to have l10n bugs in the same place as
software bugs. Just being able to move a bug to a different product is
vital.
We do have
https://pagure.io/g11n/issues and I think it can happily
co-exist with Bugzilla.
Best regards,
--
Piotr Drąg
https://piotrdrag.fedorapeople.org