On 01/05/2016 08:32 PM, Besnik Bleta wrote:
Andrei,
Besnik,
I see the points you’re trying to make, but your tone is hurting
people.
I repeat, it is not necessary to translate a business conversation in
the sphere of emotions. and, I believe, do not try to protect someone,
all those present here are adults and, for sure, can stand up for
themselves. I hope it is clear that I have no purpose to offend someone
or somehow hurt. My participation in this conversation is to clarify the
situation and to warn against making efforts in the wrong direction.
if you have arguments to defend your position with him, such as links to
the official definition of materials that guide you. please bring them.
I would like to finally get acquainted with them.
One could simply continue her/his l10n work ignoring g11n completely.
My
understanding is that l10n and g11n projects can have independent lives.
speaking in this way, you argue wrong. It should make as much effort in
the right direction. and for this, the right direction is to be
determined. primarily in clear and accessible terms that can be discussed.
but at the moment we have a situation where it is not clear that it is
not clear to what purpose, ostensibly, will lead to something. for what?
what purpose?
none of those who use the term "globalization" does not provide links to
its definition and the materials they are guided, and most importantly,
for what purpose this process should lead (apart from the actual
"control" of existing projects with its own management).
and some do not mind, to "another" project of doing something. do you
know, what will do the project and what are its goals?