On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft <jean-baptiste@holcroft.fr> wrote:

Can you please confirm there is no objection in renaming cvsl10n to l10n ?
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6320
=> if no objection by friday, I'll send to infra team for action.

It's OK for me. l10n is simpler and better. 
 
Can you please confirm there is no objection in running this cleanup?
https://pagure.io/g11n/issue/37
=> if no objection by friday, I'll send to infra team for action.

Agree to Pravin, we need further discussion on pagure.

--
Regards,

Tian Shixiong
Fedora Project Contributor