2012/8/21 Kévin Raymond <shaiton(a)fedoraproject.org>:
We have already tried to have a meeting years ago and it did not
work
(because of timezone).
If it works, the best is the mailing list.
Yes, (bi-)weekly meetings were hardly a success.
Yes, this "admininstrative" group could still be the
FLSCo.
But we can have a FAS group different than the FLSCo one. The FLSCo
clearly understand the L10n process and help set the roadmap if
needed, while the FAS group would be the guys having the right to
accept/reject the L10n creation teams or mailing lists (also update
their maintainers). Simpler if they are the same, but one can be FLSCo
member for 2 years but l10n FAS administrator a longer time as he
will master the team creation process and he would still be trust.
(Also, I am not sure that we need to update the FLSCo member too
frequently.. Therefor those two groups could be composed of the same
team).
The best is probably to create a new thread for that and to clearly
explain all the change that would be made (with a wiki page). I'll try
to write that but I am not sure when I am going to do it. Soon
hopefully..
I think there are two issues here. First, we need to make a new
elections for FLSCo ASAP. Last time we chose members was around F9, I
think.
Some of them are not around anymore, and some new active people
appeared. That's you, Kévin. :)
Second issue is accepting new teams in Transifex. I don't think one
needs to be in FLSCo to do that. As long as a maintainer-to-be follows
our guidelines, I don't see a problem when respected member of FLP
accepts the request.
FYI I've sent a TX message to all guys requesting a new team to
let
them start the process.
That's great! We already see the results. :)
--
Piotr Drąg
http://raven.fedorapeople.org/