Hi Jérôme !
I like your ideas. A glossary everyone could check would be awesome.
Cheers, thanks,
Sylvia
On Saturday, 14 May 2016, Jérôme Fenal <jfenal(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2016-05-09 22:30 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste <jean-baptiste(a)holcroft.fr
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jean-baptiste@holcroft.fr');>>:
> Le 09/05/2016 à 14:29, Noriko Mizumoto a écrit :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I havn't heard any objection or negative comment, so that asked Alex
>> from Zanata team to go ahead and implement it.
>> Now, the data contains 2238 entries are available in Glossary feature
>> for ten languages in editor screen.
>> Please play around and give us feedback.
>>
>> Anyone who has interest to edit/add an entry, please raise your hand in
>> this list.
>>
>> noriko
>>
>
> Looks like fine to me, especially if we can edit it, please add me to
> this editor list.
>
Hi Noriko-san,
Can you please also add myself to the glossary editor role?
>
> Btw : can't we use the existing right management used for teams ?
>
+1
Should we file a request for enhancement somewhere?
IMHO, glossarists should be able to add any source word or locution as a
global glossary entry, thus all languages could benefit from the
construction of the glossary.
Or maybe add a feature to specify that a specific glossary entry is
irrelevant to a specific languages.
That would also enable the developement team to have some statistics about
the gloassary usage, and see if other workflows should be proposed.
Regards,
J.
--
Jérôme Fenal