Le 2019-04-02 13:07, alciregi(a)gmail.com a écrit :
Indeed, not to have a coordinator is an issue for new contributors.
We think a coordinator is mandatory because our processes requires :
* a validation to join Zanata,
* and a validation to join an obscure FAS group "cvsl10n" (for wiki
edit and vote),
* and a self introduction.
I hope we will be able someday to let people join and translate as they
wish, and send them an invitation to be part of the team/community and
introduce themselves if they wish to.
This would bring more resilience, flexibility and save time for
everyone. Self organization is often sufficient.
So, if this new contributor (FAS: emape), instead of run away from
the
project (that IMO it could be a normal reaction to such situation), he
volunteer himself to become a new coordinator of the Italian
translation team, I think that we should welcome him!
I'm fine with that, but we don't know if someone will oppose this
request. I
The thing is we should respect the previous coordinator and let them a
chance to react and to say themselves if they wish to continue or pass
over. That's the reason why we do it in the open. I remember we already
discussed this two years ago, but don't remember if we decided to wait
two weeks or more to the previous coordinator.
Anyway, it would be great to have a second candidate to Italian team
coordinator to prevent a new blocked situation in the future.