If you have only 2 translators, then it may not be a problem, it gets
more difficult with 10. And if you have 20+ translators to a language,
peer-to-peer communication has proven not to be ideal. In this way,
everyone is informed of who is doing what. You only have to [Take] a
module once, and then it belongs to you until the translation is
finished, or you [Release] it. We believed this mechanism to be
extremely helpful.
Regards,
Bernd
Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan schrieb:
Sulyok Peti wrote:
> My opinion is that conflicts should be resolved according to the docs of
> CVS. By using this take-over tech. teamwork has to be done outside CVS,
> or by using another CVS repository. This might be painful for teams
> working on the large PO files like dist and anaconda.
> Regards,
> Peti
Agreed. Previously, I and another Malay translator working together
with anaconda totally using CVS. No issue about take over. Both
updates their own tree and resolve any conflict prior to committing
new translation. It works well and we manage to complete it before FC2
release.
I don't see the benefit of the take over mechanism here. Can anybody
explain?
Thanks.
-----
Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan
--
Fedora-trans-list mailing list
Fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
--
Dr. Bernd R. Groh Phone : +61 7 3514 8114
Software Engineer (Localization) Fax : +61 7 3514 8199
Red Hat Asia-Pacific Mobile: +61 403 851 269
Disclaimer:
http://apac.redhat.com/disclaimer/