On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:41:02AM +1000, Bernd Groh wrote:
Keld,
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:00:14AM +1000, Bernd Groh wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Keld,
>>
>>
>>
>>>I also have problems like that, or I have committed changes for 3 files
>>>yesterday, but the changes do not show up in the stats, and I get email
>>>that I have not committed anything and the files will be released.
>>>I reported it to red Hat, and they say that it is fixed, but then it
>>>happened again yesterday. When I committed to the cvs it reported
>>>everything fine and dandy.
>>>
>>>
>>Our apologies, it seems we have messed up some things with the switch
>>from redhat-config-* to system-config-*.
>>
>>
>
>It was not just that file, but 3 files in total. And before that
>it was also more than 1 file. I just had a look at the status page, and
>my latest 3 commits are still not reflected there, although the cvs
>commit reported everything done. I am just worried if my translations
>will make it for FC3.
>
>
I've checked, and the status pages reflect the cvs. There are still 3
packages with missing translations, anaconda (2+5), authconfig (4+0),
and system-config-users (1+1). :( I've also checked anaconda, and your
last commit to anaconda seems to be the 23rd? And you didn't get any
error messages on commit? Is anyone else experiencing such problems?
OK, I committed 4 files again, successfully. Lets see if they turn up in
the cvs and status page.
Here is the output of my commit:
Testing da.po...
**** Access allowed: keldsim is in ACL for anaconda/po.
Testing da.po...
**** Access allowed: keldsim is in ACL for authconfig/po.
Testing da.po...
**** Access allowed: keldsim is in ACL for redhat-config-packages/po.
Testing da.po...
**** Access allowed: keldsim is in ACL for redhat-config-users/po.
Checking in anaconda/da.po;
/usr/local/CVS/anaconda/po/da.po,v <-- da.po
new revision: 1.208; previous revision: 1.207
done
Running syncmail...
Mailing anaconda-commits-list@redhat.com...
...syncmail done.
Checking in authconfig/da.po;
/usr/local/CVS/authconfig/po/da.po,v <-- da.po
new revision: 1.50; previous revision: 1.49
done
Checking in system-config-packages/da.po;
/usr/local/CVS/redhat-config-packages/po/da.po,v <-- da.po
new revision: 1.46; previous revision: 1.45
done
Running syncmail...
Mailing katzj(a)redhat.com bfox(a)redhat.com tfox@redhat.com...
...syncmail done.
Checking in system-config-users/da.po;
/usr/local/CVS/redhat-config-users/po/da.po,v <-- da.po
new revision: 1.56; previous revision: 1.55
done
Running syncmail...
Mailing bfox(a)redhat.com nphilipp@redhat.com...
...syncmail done.
At the moment, you should be able to commit to every danish file, at
least as far as the status system is concerned.
Good. Thanks.
>>I believe this is directly related to the size of a translation team. If
>>you've primarily worked in smaller translation teams, then I do agree
>>with your sentiment. I do have my reservations about the new system too.
>>I've once suggested on this very list that we could build an exclude
>>list, and allow smaller teams (or teams with such preference) to be
>>excluded from the process, as such, every translator of that locale
>>would be able to commit at any time, just as it was before the new
>>system was implemented. I'm happy to put it up for discussion again,
>>since there wasn't much feedback to this suggestion. One thing I have to
>>say though, while I do have my reservations about the new system, I,
>>personally, do very much prefer it over the system that was in place
>>previously.
>>
>>
>
>I think that for my language this would be fine. The team is pretty
>small (one not-so-small person:-)
>
>
Agreed. I'll add an option for the next upgrade.
Thanks gaian.
Best regards
Keld