GNU Project handles this in an interesting way (IMHO): they won't
recognize translations of their licenses as official and having legal
value, but they MAY link the unofficial translations with the intent
of helping users to understand the license' content, provided that the
translated license meets some conditions, like stating it is an
unofficial translation and only the English translation has legal
value. More info in
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/translations.html
Maybe something similar (e.g. saying the translation is just for
helping understanding, but only English version has legal value) could
be used.
Cheers,
Rafael Fontenelle
Em seg, 20 de mai de 2019 às 12:42, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft
<jean-baptiste(a)holcroft.fr> escreveu:
>
> Le 2019-05-20 17:00, Michal Konecny a écrit :
> > Did you get any response from legal team?
>
> Nope, but this page:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Main?rd=Legal
> lead me to:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Archive:FedoraLegalIssues
> lead me to search far in the Legal mailing lsit archive to find this
> post from July 2008:
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.o...
>
> and today, on IRC, dowdle told me: "From that post you linked to, to me
> it means... translated legalese into other languages... invalidates
> it.".
>
> Which probably means that we should not translate it (crazy world).
> I'll come back on the matter once Legal team answer my question.
> _______________________________________________
> trans mailing list -- trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to trans-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/trans@lists.fedoraproject.org