Vi inoltro uno degli ultimi commenti sul ticket che parla dell'upgrade
di transifex a cui più volte abbiamo fatto riferimento in relazione ai
problemi con la versione presente sui server Fedora.
Il riassunto è: visto che non pare esserci uno o più persone
seriamente interessate ad installare e sopratutto *mantenere* il
sistema in efficienza all'interno della infrastruttura Fedora, si sta
valutando l'idea di appoggiarsi a
transifex.net per le nostre
traduzioni.
Ci sarà un meeting per discuterne Giovedì, se qualcuno ha tempo per
partecipare e rappresentare il team Italiano credo potrebbe essere
utile.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2389#comment:58
====
Infrastructure meetings are 20:00 UTC on Thursdays - this didn't come
up last meeting since a bunch of people (like glezos) were at FOSDEM.
I've pinged glezos to find out when he can discuss this at a meeting,
and I'll update this ticket with the date.
Here's a quick summary of the FUDCon discussion:
We aren't supporting transifex very well. It's usually broken/slow,
and translators are finding it easier to commit to git directly. This
is due to a lack of people joining the infrastructure team and
committing to maintaining the app.
We all agreed that moving to
tx.net solves all of these problems - we
asked spot if there were any legal/CLA issues with moving to
tx.net,
and he said it shouldn't be a problem.
And that's basically what we discussed at FUDCon - we did not discuss
what our requirements are for user auth (if any) or how it'd affect
the Fedora l10n team workflow, which is why we'd love l10n people to
come and give their perspective.
===
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://identi.ca/giallu -
http://twitter.com/giallu