I have support for PATA drive on a promise controller in FC4. However, in FC5-T2 on the same machine the drive are not seem. Who broke the code? I want my PATA drives back.
Jim
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 08:14:11PM -0700, James C. Bevier wrote:
I have support for PATA drive on a promise controller in FC4. However, in FC5-T2 on the same machine the drive are not seem. Who broke the code? I want my PATA drives back.
The 2.6.15 tree was broken by some wrong patches. I did point it out at the time but if its a PATA raid card then I suspect that is the problem. File a bug giving the PCI vendor id/device id and the device class as reported by lspci
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Cox" alan@redhat.com To: "For testers of Fedora Core development releases" fedora-test-list@redhat.com Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 1:13 PM Subject: Re: PATA support on Promise broke
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 08:14:11PM -0700, James C. Bevier wrote:
I have support for PATA drive on a promise controller in FC4. However, in FC5-T2 on the same machine the drive are not seem. Who broke the code? I want my PATA drives back.
The 2.6.15 tree was broken by some wrong patches. I did point it out at the time but if its a PATA raid card then I suspect that is the problem. File a bug giving the PCI vendor id/device id and the device class as reported by lspci
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179369
Jim
Me too.
I think I have the exact same hardware. I've been seeing this off and on for a while. I'm only using FC4 not the devel branch. I thought the funny bit was that the installer could see discs on the parallel port of that controller but the installed kernel could not. I've sence updated to kernel-2.6.14-1.1656_FC4 which sees the disc.
-
Alan Cox -
Jim Bevier -
Kevin H. Hobbs