Greg spake thusly:
Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
> The "other guys" (i.e. Mandriva, openSUSE & Ubuntu) also have KDE 4 in
> their beta, but they also have the more stable (and useable) KDE 3 as
> well.
>
> KDE 4 looks great, but it beyond buggy (I've tried it in all of the
> above distros). Fedora is no exception. I was using it yesterday and
> it's a disaster. You could spend all day filing bug reports. :)
>
> So why not have KDE 3 also? KDE 4 is not really useable as of yet.
>
>
>
Fedora has always been Bleeding Edge
This I'm aware of. It's one of the reasons I like it. :)
so it will use the most updated KDE
But we're talking and entire Desktop Environment. Not just a few packages.
> whether its stable or not they use that, ..Fedora an ubuntu an
Mandriva
are going/moving in different Directions ..KDE3 is in KDE4 just some
parts of KDE to make KDE4 work as smooth as they can get it till
KDE4.1.X comes out
Amd the mix of KDE3 and 4 is rather jarring frmo an asthetic point of
view.
I lay most of the fault with KDE. They got a bit anxious when it came to
releasing KDE 4. Frankly, I think it's still a "beta quality" product at
best.
--
Scott
http://angrykeyboarder.com
I've never used an OS I didn't (dis)like.
I'm angrykeyboarder™ and I approved this message.