On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:54:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 17:47 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 29 November 2011 17:40, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hey, folks. I'm working through the f16 QA retrospective, and one of the
> > suggestions is:
> >
> > "might need improved / more Xen test cases"
> >
>
> Does this mean various DomU tests or Dom0 tests?
That's sort of the question, I'm asking, really!
It would be nice to expand the tests, and it kind of boils down to:
1) Does it boot
2) Does it work
The complexity is that there are three modes of this: HVM (so similar
to the KVM test-case), PV (we got that covered now), and the Dom0 (which
is mostly - does it boot and you kind of implicitly need to do this before
you can do the other two).
So I think it makes sense to add the HVM case in the test-matrix - it
is pretty simple and similar to the KVM one.
The dom0 is a bit more complex, but we already have it outlined in the
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0 in the Documentation
part - so it should be fairly easy to lift it out of there. (adn the stuff
about the bridge is not needed anymore).
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing list
test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test