On Dec 27, 2007 11:58 AM, Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> 1. provide a subpackage with the kernel module sources
> 2. let this package obsolete kmod-sysprof
> 3. provide a build procedure for the kernel module
> 4. patch the main sysprof application to help the user understanding
> what is going on
Please don't do this. What would be an advantage of this approach
compared to shipping a binary module? The solution that seems most
logical for me is to remove the sysprof package from Fedora altogether,
and it will surely find some love in Livna and RPMFusion.
The main advantage of this approach is actually that I can avoid
moving the package between repos...
I hope to get some more (different?) views on the topic
Thanks a lot
Gianluca