Greetings,
This is great data, thanks for sharing Orion! I've cc'd the test@ list
as well since I think this is of value there.
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:10 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my
1000th bug
report at
bugzilla.redhat.com (unfortunately closed NOTABUG). I thought I'd
take a look at my statistics.
First bug filed 2002-12-07 (RHL 8.0)
Avg rate of bugs - 1 / 2.85 days
Most bugs filed in a day: 7
7 2008-03-18
7 2009-03-17
(Hmm, what is it about the ides of March! (probably testing new releases))
Top months:
29 2009-03
33 2008-03
By year:
1 2002
5 2003
18 2004
123 2005
198 2006
145 2007
197 2008
192 2009
I'm wondering if this was related to the anaconda storage re-write?
That doesn't explain the similar numbers from previous years, but it
would be interesting+difficult to map these trends to releases/features.
121 2010 (a little slow to hit my ~200/year pace)
Top components:
19 autofs (we automount home and data dirs)
21 NetworkManager
32 selinux-policy-targeted
73 Package Review
91 selinux-policy ( I like quiet logwatch reports! )
104 kernel
112 anaconda (I do a lot of automated installs)
I've said this to you before, but I'll say it again ... thank you for
your contributions to Fedora installation validation.
6 palindrome bugs:
523325
528825
587785
523325
528825
587785
Heh, cute statistic. It's a shame there are no door prizes for the
number of palindrome bugs. Otherwise, you would win them. :P
Open:
24 ASSIGNED
4 MODIFIED
73 NEW
4 ON_QA
Resolved:
"valid":
10 CLOSED CANTFIX
134 CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
2 CLOSED DEFERRED
75 CLOSED ERRATA
125 CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
265 CLOSED RAWHIDE
19 CLOSED UPSTREAM
"invalid":
70 CLOSED DUPLICATE
8 CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
99 CLOSED NOTABUG
70 CLOSED WONTFIX
18 CLOSED WORKSFORME
So 26.5% (so far) of my reports are no so useful. I shall have to try harder!
I don't think I'd call them 'not useful'. I subscribe to having more
data, than no data. Of course, as a maintainer I've never had to
DUPLICATE a large number of bugs. Your duplicate numbers above, while
yes they add time spent triaging and duplicating related issues, they
also impress upon the prevalence of the problem.
Here's to the next 1000!
Congrats and cheers! :)
Thanks,
James