On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:46:10AM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
So I'd strongly prefer a 1.4 build as a random failure @build
infrastructure (which is not the maintainers fault), should not block
any build to be part of a (alpha/beta/final) release.
I think ultimately we need a way to get these out of lockstep with the
main release. We should be able to build and publish Spins/Labs on
their own cycles (ideally without human intervention required from
How much use do you see of the Astronomy Spin as bootable media or its
own install? For some, this really makes sense (the desktops, the
security lab) but it seems like maybe Astronomy might be better as a
curated software set in GNOME Software?
Fedora Project Leader