fedora-test-list-request(a)redhat.com wrote:
Message: 5 Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:36:31 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen
<davidsen(a)tmr.com> Subject: Re: Getting rid of /boot To: Fedora Test
<fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com> Message-ID: <4B1B0A9F.6050606(a)tmr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Marko
Vojinovic wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 December 2009 13:43:52 Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> >> Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>>
>>>> >>>> Actually, the complexity is that Fedora for some insane
reason still
>>>> >>>> defaults to using LVM for everything *other* than /boot.
This brings
>>>> >>>> no benefit to most users.
>>>>
>>> >>> Well, it means I can have separate filesystems for things that I
don't
>>> >>> want overwritten if I reinstall (/home, /usr/local, /opt,
/var/www,
>>> >>> etc.)
>>>
>> >> That's only 4, or 7 with / , /boot and swap.
>> >> How do you get up to 15?
>>
> >
> > Multiboot with various Windows, Ubuntu's, other Fedora's? Each should
have its
> > own /, at least.
> >
>
That's what VMs are for, no?
> > That said, if one does not work in multi-platform software development, I
> > totally agree that cluttering the disk with all that stuff is very ugly, at
> > the very least. These days virtual machines are much cleaner and easier to
> > maintain than multiboot setups.
> >
> > Best, :-)
> > Marko
> >
>
-- Bill Davidsen <davidsen(a)tmr.com> "We have more to fear from the
bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked."
- from Slashdot
While I am sure VMs and virtualization are the the way of the
future
many of us still for economic reasons work on systems which cannot or
will not support Virtualization efficiently. This makes multi-boot and
the associated headaches a necessity rather than a preference. While I
applaud the steps Fedora has taken in Virtualization and LVM
development, maintaining legacy hardware compatability should also
receive attention as it provides us a competetive edge over the Redmond
OSes.
Bob Lightfoot