On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 6:21 PM Chris Murphy <lists(a)colorremedies.com> wrote:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/912650
Does openqa only do qcow2 tests? I'm not seeing raw tests. I'm just
curious for another data point. :P
I'm seeing Rawhide and 33 images passing (couple warn, no fail). And
on 34 only x86_64 fail, but all of them fail and they're all failing
at the firmware as if it's not finding a bootloader at all. Hence
wondering if there might be a difference between raw and qcow2...
OK I think it doesn't matter because:
(in case mua munging happens with my paste)
https://paste.centos.org/view/49c75eb9
# dd if=Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210620.0.x86_64.raw count=1 2>/dev/null
| hexdump -C
00000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
*
000001c0 02 00 ee ff ff ff 01 00 00 00 ff ff 7f 00 00 00 |................|
000001d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
*
000001f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 55 aa |..............U.|
00000200
#
That's clearly wrong... No bootloader in LBA 0. And if I understand
correctly, the raw and qcow2 come from the same image. The qcow2 comes
from qemu-img convert (raw to qcow2) so that'd explain the openqa
failure on the qcow2. Busted!
I don't see a grub2-install command in this log:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/Fedora-Cloud-Base/34/2021062...
I'm not sure if it should be in that log with the rest of the anaconda
stuff though.
--
Chris Murphy