And as a closing one for OT stuff - the correct use of reply-to is
unfortunately optional in the RFC. I knew all of this hence my excuse. Still
noone has reacted to the point I raised.
But as at least one person on this list values thraed-completeness over
content, I gather it is better to simply accept that no matter what argument
is used, if it isn't done in whatever artificial definition of correctness
it will be ignored.
Thanks for showing me.
Jan
Show replies by date