I'm getting the following error with FC7t1 when trying to update with yum:
--> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libk3b.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package k3b-extras Error: Missing Dependency: libtk8.5.so()(64bit) is needed by package PIL Error: Missing Dependency: libFLAC++.so.5()(64bit) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libk3bdevice.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package k3b-extras Error: Missing Dependency: libFLAC.so.7()(64bit) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libtcl8.5.so()(64bit) is needed by package PIL
I can' t say with certainty which repositories are enabled as I set these up a while back. For example, I know that atrpms is checked, but I don't have that repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/
Any help appreciated.
On Saturday 24 February 2007 9:45:04 pm Doctor Who wrote:
Error: Missing Dependency: libtcl8.5.so()(64bit) is needed by package PIL
I can' t say with certainty which repositories are enabled as I set these up a while back. For example, I know that atrpms is checked, but I don't have that repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/
Any help appreciated.
PIL is not from Fedora, the equivalent package is python-imaging where this problem does not occur. It has been rebuild to take care of tcl/tk downgrade.
On 2/24/07, José Matos jamatos@fc.up.pt wrote:
On Saturday 24 February 2007 9:45:04 pm Doctor Who wrote:
Error: Missing Dependency: libtcl8.5.so()(64bit) is needed by package PIL
I can' t say with certainty which repositories are enabled as I set these up a while back. For example, I know that atrpms is checked, but I don't have that repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/
Any help appreciated.
PIL is not from Fedora, the equivalent package is python-imaging where this problem does not occur. It has been rebuild to take care of tcl/tk downgrade.
python-imaging library is what is now installed and PIL is shown as an update (from atrpms). I suppose I could remove atrpms as a repo...how is that done?
Also, any ideas on how to resolve the other dependency issues?
Thanks.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:45:04 -0500, Doctor Who wrote:
I'm getting the following error with FC7t1 when trying to update with yum:
--> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libk3b.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package k3b-extras Error: Missing Dependency: libtk8.5.so()(64bit) is needed by package PIL Error: Missing Dependency: libFLAC++.so.5()(64bit) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libk3bdevice.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package k3b-extras Error: Missing Dependency: libFLAC.so.7()(64bit) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libtcl8.5.so()(64bit) is needed by package PIL
I can' t say with certainty which repositories are enabled as I set these up a while back. For example, I know that atrpms is checked, but I don't have that repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/
A fixed Audacity package is in the needsign queue.
On 2/24/07, Michael Schwendt mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@arcor.de wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:45:04 -0500, Doctor Who wrote:
I'm getting the following error with FC7t1 when trying to update with yum:
--> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libk3b.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package k3b-extras Error: Missing Dependency: libtk8.5.so()(64bit) is needed by package PIL Error: Missing Dependency: libFLAC++.so.5()(64bit) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libk3bdevice.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package k3b-extras Error: Missing Dependency: libFLAC.so.7()(64bit) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libtcl8.5.so()(64bit) is needed by package PIL
I can' t say with certainty which repositories are enabled as I set these up a while back. For example, I know that atrpms is checked, but I don't have that repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/
A fixed Audacity package is in the needsign queue.
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
Ok....good to know. And k3b-extras?
Thanks.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:35:08 -0500, Doctor Who wrote:
I'm getting the following error with FC7t1 when trying to update with yum:
--> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libk3b.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package k3b-extras
Ok....good to know. And k3b-extras?
k3b 1.0* is ABI-incompatible with k3b 0.12.*
After several weeks of sitting in CVS in form of 1.0rc6 it was built and released into Rawhide without a warning. So, k3b-extras needs an update, too.
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:35:08 -0500, Doctor Who wrote:
Ok....good to know. And k3b-extras?
k3b 1.0* is ABI-incompatible with k3b 0.12.*
After several weeks of sitting in CVS in form of 1.0rc6 it was built and released into Rawhide without a warning. So, k3b-extras needs an update, too.
I had suggested in the merge review for k3b that it (basically) Obsoletes: k3b-extras < %{version}
If that doesn't happen in a timely manner, perhaps we could simply remove k3b-extras from devel/rawhide.
-- Rex
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:36:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:35:08 -0500, Doctor Who wrote:
Ok....good to know. And k3b-extras?
k3b 1.0* is ABI-incompatible with k3b 0.12.*
After several weeks of sitting in CVS in form of 1.0rc6 it was built and released into Rawhide without a warning. So, k3b-extras needs an update, too.
I had suggested in the merge review for k3b that it (basically) Obsoletes: k3b-extras < %{version}
If that doesn't happen in a timely manner, perhaps we could simply remove k3b-extras from devel/rawhide.
And break upgrades from FC <= 6? Not an option, IMO.
Obsoleting k3b-extras OR upgrading it is a MUSTFIX issue.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:58:35 +0100 mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@arcor.de (Michael Schwendt) wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:36:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:35:08 -0500, Doctor Who wrote:
Ok....good to know. And k3b-extras?
k3b 1.0* is ABI-incompatible with k3b 0.12.*
After several weeks of sitting in CVS in form of 1.0rc6 it was built and released into Rawhide without a warning. So, k3b-extras needs an update, too.
I had suggested in the merge review for k3b that it (basically) Obsoletes: k3b-extras < %{version}
If that doesn't happen in a timely manner, perhaps we could simply remove k3b-extras from devel/rawhide.
And break upgrades from FC <= 6? Not an option, IMO.
Obsoleting k3b-extras OR upgrading it is a MUSTFIX issue.
+1.
FWIW, a rebuild of k3b-extras here in mock works fine. Why not bump the release and rebuild for now?
Once the main k3b can obsolete this there will be no reason to rebuild, but until then, you should keep current to avoid broken dependencies.
kevin
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:58:35 +0100 mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@arcor.de (Michael Schwendt) wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:36:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
I had suggested in the merge review for k3b that it (basically) Obsoletes: k3b-extras < %{version}
If that doesn't happen in a timely manner, perhaps we could simply remove k3b-extras from devel/rawhide.
And break upgrades from FC <= 6? Not an option, IMO. Obsoleting k3b-extras OR upgrading it is a MUSTFIX issue.
+1.
FWIW, a rebuild of k3b-extras here in mock works fine. Why not bump the release and rebuild for now?
It'll take more than a simple rebuild, but an upgrade from 0.12 -> 1.0rc, which isn't worth it, imo, for package whose lifetime would be measured in days/weeks.
-- Rex
-
Doctor Who -
José Abílio Matos -
Kevin Fenzi -
Michael Schwendt -
Rex Dieter