On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:24:59PM +0000, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Package: shim-signed-13-0.2 Old package: shim-signed-0.8-10 Summary: First-stage UEFI bootloader RPMs: shim-aa64 shim-ia32 shim-x64 Added RPMs: shim-aa64 shim-ia32 shim-x64 Dropped RPMs: shim Size: 2238688 bytes Size change: 1219336 bytes Changelog:
- Thu Mar 23 2017 Petr Šabata contyk@redhat.com - 0.8-9
- Re-enable dist tag for module builds
- Tue Aug 22 2017 Peter Jones pjones@redhat.com - 13-0.1
- Initial (partially unsigned) build for multi-arch support on x64/ia32.
- Thu Aug 24 2017 Peter Jones pjones@redhat.com - 13-0.2}
- Obsolete old shim builds.
The package no longer ships /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/shim.efi which is what people's boot entries refer to. It's shimx64.efi now. This causes failure to boot on EFI systems.
Which component, if any, is tasked with adjusting EFI boot entries in such a case? Anyway, it doesn't happen, so some kind of warning (at least to -devel and -test) would seem appropriate, ideally prior to the new package reaching the mirrors.
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Lars Seipel lars.seipel@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:24:59PM +0000, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Package: shim-signed-13-0.2 Old package: shim-signed-0.8-10 Summary: First-stage UEFI bootloader RPMs: shim-aa64 shim-ia32 shim-x64 Added RPMs: shim-aa64 shim-ia32 shim-x64 Dropped RPMs: shim Size: 2238688 bytes Size change: 1219336 bytes Changelog:
- Thu Mar 23 2017 Petr Šabata contyk@redhat.com - 0.8-9
- Re-enable dist tag for module builds
- Tue Aug 22 2017 Peter Jones pjones@redhat.com - 13-0.1
- Initial (partially unsigned) build for multi-arch support on x64/ia32.
- Thu Aug 24 2017 Peter Jones pjones@redhat.com - 13-0.2}
- Obsolete old shim builds.
The package no longer ships /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/shim.efi which is what people's boot entries refer to. It's shimx64.efi now. This causes failure to boot on EFI systems.
Which component, if any, is tasked with adjusting EFI boot entries in
Probably efibootmgr or grubby, the former is more ljkely but I'd just file a bug against shim-signed as they're all maintained by the same group/person.
Peter