On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
sgallagh and I both noticed that the release criteria do not currently
include any requirements around Edition branding or installer
customizations. We think they probably should. Thus, we're proposing
the following new criteria. They would be in a new section for each
page, something like "Edition requirements" or something like that,
probably with a brief explanation of what "Editions" are outside of any
specific criterion text.

For Beta:

== Installer customization ==

For each Edition, all significant functional customization of installer
behavior that are intended to be a part of that Edition must take
effect on that Edition's installable release-blocking images.

footnote: 'Significant functional?': significant functional
customization would usually include, for e.g., changes to the default
filesystem and firewall configuration. The WG or SIG responsible for
each Edition has the definitive say on what is or is not considered a
'significant functional customization' for that Edition.

For Final:

== Self-identification ==

For each Edition, the installer must be clearly identified as that
Edition in all of that Edition's installable release-blocking images.
Also, for any deployment of that Edition in accordance with the rest of
these criteria, the relevant fields in {{filename|/etc/os-release}}
must include the correct Edition name.

Thoughts, comments, suggestions, flames? Thanks!

Sounds reasonable.