2007/12/3, Tom London <selinux(a)gmail.com>:
> On Dec 3, 2007 6:03 AM, Antonio <antonio.montagnani(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2007/12/3, Antonio Olivares <olivares14031(a)yahoo.com>:
> >
> > >
> > > --- Antonio <antonio.montagnani(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2.6.24-0.62rc3.git5.fc9 doesn't boot here.
> > > >
> > > > I am surprised since 42 no other kernel boots.
> > > > I love installing kernels and disinstalling......
> > > > ;-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Antonio Montagnani
> > > > Skype : antoniomontag
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > fedora-test-list mailing list
> > > > fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
> > > > To unsubscribe:
> > > >
> > >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> > > >
> > >
> > > Absolutely! It does not boot :(
> > >
> > > It hangs in
> > >
> > > TCP: Hash tables configured (established 131072 bind
> > > 65536)
> > > TCP reno registered
> > > checking if image is initramfs...
> > >
> > > Thanks for warning me :)
> > >
> > > I have removed it from the system
> > > # rpm -e 2.6.24-0.62rc3.git5.fc9
> > >
> > > 42 is the still the good kernel here :)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Antonio
> > >
> > >
> > >
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > > Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.
> > > Make Yahoo! your homepage.
> > >
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> > >
> > > --
> > > fedora-test-list mailing list
> > > fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
> > > To unsubscribe:
> > >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> > >
> > yes...exactly at the same point.
> > Anybody else out there????
> >
> >
> Bug in gcc. See here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=407281
>
> Should be fixed soon.
>
> tom
> --
> Tom London
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
Tom
I suppose that until the bug is not fixed no kernel should be
released: otherwise it is a waste of time and bits....
As I understand this bug, it only affects x86 architectures (i686,
i586, etc.), but not 64bit or other archs.
gcc-4.1.2-35 is reported to fix the issue. Would expect the next spin
(or the one after that) to work.
tom
--
Tom London