Antonio M wrote:
2008/2/23, Andrew Farris <lordmorgul(a)gmail.com>:
> A rawhide box that starts as F8 and gets updated hundreds of times before F9
> release is NOT expected to be the same as an F8 box that is upgraded once to
> F9... it needs to be reinstalled as a fresh F9 install after the release to be
> truly stable F9 install. Rawhide is not a step-by-step upgrade from F8 to F9.
>
>
> --
> Andrew Farris <lordmorgul(a)gmail.com>
www.lordmorgul.net
> gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
> No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
> ---- ----
>
> --
>
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
in the same way a F9 upgraded from a F8 is not the same as a fresh F9
install :-) (of course in a minor degree).
And in my experience I switched from F7 to F8 by rawhide and
experience was not bad at all!!! But I agree with you.
Yes, I'm not suggesting that a upgrades don't work well, or that even rawhide
updated continually does not eventually work ok, but it is definitely not the
same end result as major version upgrades.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul(a)gmail.com>
www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----