On 8/29/19 2:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 20:15 +0200, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> Could we go on a more generic fashion?
>
> Something like "Supported container engines must work on their basic
> features on all the blocker deliverables were they are installed by
> default"
>
> Our supported engines are, podman? cri-o?
We could, but I think it's only necessary if there are either a *lot*
of criteria and/or we decide to have more than one.
Matthew, Dusty, any thoughts on whether we would want to support any
beyond podman? So far docker and cri-o have been brought up. My guess
would be we'd probably want podman and not docker, but I'm not sure
about cri-o...
Well CRI-O and Kubernetes are not ready for the CGRoupsV2 change, Nor is
Moby.
I would say podman and buildah should work.
We need changes upstream to get the other packages to be supported.