On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 15:15 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/24/2009 01:43 PM, James Laska wrote:
Good points. My $0.02. I'd suggest we narrow the focus to all applications accessible from the menu for the LiveCD or default install. Would I like to see this expand, definitely. I don't want to bite off more than we can chew.
One *favorite* LiveCD regardless if it's the Gnome one or not over another one will gradually start causing rift in the community.
That's certainly not what QA would hope to convey from this process. As an exercise for the reader ... I intentionally didn't specify which LiveCD.
All spins should be treated equal in the eyes of QA ;)
It sounds like a good long-term goal, but I don't fully agree that we could hit this short-term. However, we shouldn't be making it more difficult or excluding other spins.
It's just up to the relevant spins sig on how much they work with QA.
The more they work with QA the more the spin is exposed to testing..
That's a good approach. What can we offer as a benefit for working with QA?
Thanks, James