On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:34:26AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
James Laska (jlaska(a)redhat.com) said:
> I'm not in favor of this criteria addition at this time. I'd love to
> see this happen, but I don't think it's realistic at this stage in the
> release or in this forum (F-14). Can we have more input from devel +
> rel-eng who initially proposed the change?
I'd be willing to extend/change this such that:
- Trees are tested for broken dependencies
- All broken dependencies are filed
- These tickets are attached to the nice-to-have tracker
We can work towards the point where the third bullet here is changed
to 'the blocker tracker', but if we can't do that now, I would still
like to *track* the problem.
This seems like an excellent compromise to me, and we should pursue a
more stringent requirement for F15 if people are amenable to that.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies:
http://opensource.com