On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
<johannbg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just bringing this topic to the appropriate mailing list
>
> On the last kernel meeting [1] it was suggested negative karma points should
> be linked to a reported bug which kinda makes sense if you think about it.
>
> What that means is that you ( as in reporter ) will no longer be able to
> provide negative karma without linking it to an already existing bug report
> either created by your or someone else if that came to be.
Is there such a surplus of people testing things and providing
negative karma that it's acceptable to refuse any that doesn't come
with a bug report? And is the pain of bugless negative karma so great
that it will overcome the cost of an additional mandatory step in the
karma reporting process?