On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 09:13 +0100, Douglas Furlong wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 19:34 +0200, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:
> tir, 19.10.2004 kl. 07.09 skrev Douglas Furlong:
> > On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 00:30 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:06:33 +0100, Douglas Furlong
> > > <snip>
> > And a nice link from the vino config section to the
system-config-
> > sercuritylevel.
What is wrong with a user level configuration tool, like
redhat-config-
printer, gdmsetup, or any number of other things, having a link to the
system-config-securitylelevel which requires root privileges?
I accepted the "error" in my original statement, but I don't see what
the problem is with having the above linking together so that the user
see's where he is meant to go to get the system up and running.
Currently we're not powerful enough in for custom ports. So that a user
requires specific application knowledge to allow - 5900 say rather than
selecting by service.
I'm hoping to fix this after fc3 is out the door. I'd say wait until we
have a easier to understand ui for this.
Paul