On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 07:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:06 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > And it's also just semantically wrong - the word 'assigned'
> > does not mean 'triaged'.
> It can also be a bit annoying when there are multiple maintainers for a
> package, and it gets "assigned" to the main maintainer. Personally
> prefer e.g. renaming "new" to "unconfirmed", and
That doesn't work either, though, for the same objection - it's not
'confirmed', it's triaged. We don't require reproduction as part of the
Well, now I think about it, we could have UNCONFIRMED and CONFIRMED, and
a 'Triaged' flag, as those two definitions are different; you can have a
bug that's been confirmed but not triaged, and vice versa. And that may
actually be useful information. Yay, complications!
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org