--- "Paul W. Frields" <paul(a)frields.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 14:24, William Hooper wrote:
> Looking in the archives gives the indication that
at least for the first
> FC release it was planned to have a RHN channel
for errata. I don't know
> if that has changed or not.
It might be interesting here to note that RHN had
channels for FC-0.93
and FC-0.94 (under one name or another), but none
for FC-0.95 -- this
was obviated by the availability of the HTTP rawhide
Rawhide is good for updating betas, but terrible as a
repository for stable updates. I hope there is at
least some way of getting ordinary straight-up
security updates, whether via RHN or a YUM channel.
What I wonder is how come the blue checkmark in the
RHN applet never turns red when updates are available?
Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears