On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 15:34 Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 2:40 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
<fzatlouk(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'd prefer something like:
> *All system services present after installation with one of the
> release-blocking package sets must not time out every time when they are
> being stopped during system reboot/shutdown.*
>
It's possible but I find it too weak. See my reply to Ben, thanks.
>
>
> I like the general proposal, just different wording seems better. If
> timeout doesn't happen regularly, I won't block on it.
>
"Every time" is different from "regularly".
Doesn't need to be. "Every time" implies "regularly",
"regularly" can mean
"every time".
I get your point, for the record, I am for blocking on this only if it
happens every time.