On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:20:05 +0000
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 03/01/2013 08:19 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> By the way, I see this topic relevant just for developers of one of
> Fedora QA apps, it doesn't really influence the testers community
> in any way - the email notifications influence them (and the
> solution is clear there), not the trac location. So I wouldn't
> waste too much time on discussions and explanations here. Let's try
> the trac-defaultcc-plugin, if it doesn't work we can try something
I have been looking into replacing trac with an actual request
tracker application thus starting to tie us to specific trac plugins
and any other functionality in track is a NO GO and will just hurt us
in the long run so I rather see an specific qa-devel trac instance
which could act as an bug tracker for what's being develop in the QA
Community then having us start relying to much on trac.
I don't see how using the defaultcc plugin would hurt us in the long
run any more than using trac in general would. It sends email
notifications for a compnent's tickets to a different list - so what? I
don't see how that would make any eventual migration to a new tracker
system any more or less difficult.
Out of curiosity, which tracker system are you looking into?