Horst H. von Brand wrote:
Creating the image is rather easy; checking that it doesn't break badly or
has any other undesired side effects, repeating the above for all
supported
architectures, shipping them out to mirrors (and getting mirrors to agree
on carrying more large files) is where the real work is. Plus the risk of
Accepted - but I was doing a private re-spin for my own use.
giving Fedora a bad name with a busted respin. Just check how long
it
takes
to move from the first images to the images finally shipped on release.
Sure, for a respin the work would be somewhat less (much less brand-new
contents), but still.
Of course - but as I said it was/is a private respin - if someone does this
and it breaks their system then Fedora is not responsible. However I do
know of some people who installed the release iso for F10 on a machine with
real scsi disks and this left them with an unbootable system until an
install from the DVD physical media was done in a different way.
Doing a private iso with updated mkinitrd/kernel/nash that were issued as
updates since release might have helped in that case.
Besides, there is Fedora Unity... why do a job others have already
volunteered to do?
At the present time I have not seen a re-spin available from Fedora Unity
for the DVD install iso? SO making a private one is for me under this
scenario the only option!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Where-has-the-F10-DVD-iso-file-gone--tp21194664p212...
Sent from the Fedora Test List mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.